Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy

被引:25
作者
Dahl, Douglas M.
He, Wenlei
Lazarus, Ross
McDougal, W. Scott
Wu, Chin-Lee
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Channing Labs, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1054
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To compare the clinicopathologic data of 286 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRPs) and 714 open radical prostatectomies (RRPs) performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2001 to 2005. Methods. A total of 1000 radical prostatectomy procedures were analyzed for prostate weight, pathologic stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and positive margin location. Results. The mean patient age was 58.6 and 59.1 years for the LRP and RRP groups, respectively. The mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was 5.96 and 6.00 ng/mL, respectively. Clinical Stage T1 c cancer was seen in 86.4% of the LRP and 90.5% of the RRP patients. Gleason score 7 or less disease was seen on biopsy in 97.5% of the LRP and 96.9% of the RRP patients. The average prostate weight was 46.8 g for LRP and 46.0 g for RRP. In the radical prostatectomy specimens, 94.4% of LRP and 93.3% of RRP patients had Gleason score 7 or less disease and 86.0% of LRP and 81.7% of RRP patients had pathologic Stage pT2 cancer. The rate of positive surgical margins was 15.0% and 17.4% for the LRP and RRP groups, respectively. The positive margins occurred mainly at the peripheral and apical regions in both groups. No significant difference was found in the preoperative variables or final pathologic findings between the two surgical groups. Conclusions. With similar case selection, LRP and RRP achieve similar pathologic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1256
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Cicco, A ;
Saint, F ;
Alame, W ;
Bellot, J ;
Chopin, DK .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (05) :630-633
[2]   Screening with low PSA cutoff values results in low rates of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Berger, AP ;
Volgger, H ;
Rogatsch, H ;
Strohmeyer, D ;
Steiner, H ;
Klocker, H ;
Bartsch, G ;
Horninger, W .
PROSTATE, 2002, 53 (03) :241-245
[3]   Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens [J].
Brown, JA ;
Garlitz, C ;
Gomella, LG ;
Hubosky, SG ;
Diamond, SM ;
McGinnis, D ;
Strup, SE .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (03) :481-486
[4]  
Cheng L, 1999, CANCER, V86, P1775, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1775::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-L
[6]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial 70 cases at a US university medical center [J].
Dahl, DM ;
L'esperance, JO ;
Trainer, AF ;
Jiang, Z ;
Gallagher, K ;
Litwin, DEM ;
Blute, RD .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :859-863
[7]   Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) :651-&
[8]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation [J].
Fromont, G ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :661-665
[9]   Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: Data from the CaPSURE database [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Chang, JJ ;
Broering, JM ;
Miller, DP ;
Yu, J ;
Flanders, SC ;
Henning, JM ;
Stier, DM ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) :1171-1177
[10]  
Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X