Towards a generic multi-criteria evaluation model for low carbon cities

被引:57
作者
Azizalrahman, Hossny [1 ]
Hasyimi, Valid [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Low carbon city; Scoring; Multi-criteria evaluation; Carbon emissions; Climate change; EMISSIONS; WEIGHTS; SYSTEM; CHINA; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The low carbon city concept has surfaced over the past decade and has been increasingly integrated with urban planning. Likewise, assessment methods of Low Carbon Cities have been initiated. Of these, are the Entropy weight method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and multi-criteria evaluation. This paper attempts to propose a multi-criteria evaluation model for city performance using a set of criteria and a benchmark with a view to determining whether the city is low carbon or not. Ten pilot cities were selected for which twenty indicators were utilized for model calibration and testing. First, a standard entropy model was employed featuring three cities as low carbon namely; Stockholm, Vienna and Sydney. Second, with the modification of entropy model by adding relative weight to indicators, two more cities were quite rightly added to the list: London and Sao Paulo. Third, the proposed model was calibrated and tested, the result of which was compared with the results of both entropy and modified entropy models. Luckily, the proposed model showed great similarity to the modified entropy model. Moreover, the model was subsequently tested independently on five additional cities comprising Copenhagen, Bogota, New Delhi, Singapore and Seoul to ascertain results. Copenhagen and Bogota were low carbon cities, the others were not. When populated with relevant data, the proposed model can readily determine whether a particular city is low carbon or not thereby obviating the need for benchmarking and score adjustment every time a new city is added to the study list.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ADEME F. E., 2013, FINAL REPORT SUMMARY
[2]   A multi-actor multi-criteria scenario analysis of regional sustainable resource policy [J].
Akgun, Aliye Ahu ;
van Leeuwen, Eveline ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 :19-28
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NEW COUNTR CLASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WHAT WASTE A GLOB RE
[5]   Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap [J].
Becker, William ;
Saisana, Michaela ;
Paruolo, Paolo ;
Vandecasteele, Ine .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 80 :12-22
[6]   Analytic approach on maximum Bayesian entropy ordered weighted averaging operators [J].
Chaji, Alireza .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 105 :260-264
[7]   Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling [J].
Chen, Shaoqing ;
Chen, Bin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 194 :774-783
[8]   Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey [J].
Deveci, Muhammet ;
Demirel, Nihan Cetin ;
John, Robert ;
Ozcan, Ender .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 27 :692-705
[9]   Making the invisible visible: how students make use of carbon footprint calculator in environmental education [J].
Edstrand, Emma .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 41 (02) :416-436
[10]   Integrated weighting approach to carbon emission quotas: an application case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J].
Han, Rong ;
Tang, Bao Jun ;
Fan, Jing-Li ;
Liu, Lan-Cui ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 :448-459