The Mo-OH proton of the low-pH form of sulfite oxidase: Comparison of the hyperfine interactions obtained from pulsed ENDOR, CW-EPR and ESEEM measurements

被引:18
作者
Astashkin, AV
Raitsimring, AM [1 ]
Feng, C
Johnson, JL
Rajagopalan, KV
Enemark, JH
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Chem, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biochem, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03166122
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学]; O56 [分子物理学、原子物理学];
学科分类号
070203 ; 070304 ; 081704 ; 1406 ;
摘要
Pulsed electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectra have been obtained for the exchangeable Mo-OH proton of the low-pH form of native chicken liver sulfite oxidase (SO) and recombinant human SO for the first time. The spectra of the two enzymes are very similar, indicating a similar binding geometry of the hydroxyl ligand to the Mo center. The isotropic hyperfine interaction (hfi) constant for the proton of the OH ligand in both enzymes is about 26 MHz. The anisotropic components of the hfi obtained from the pulsed ENDOR spectra are about 1.6-1.8 times larger than those obtained by continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance and electron spin echo envelope modulation. These hfi differences are explained by a rotational disorder of the Mo-OH group. A similar rotational disorder of the coordinated exchangeable ligand has been found previously for the high-pH and phosphate-inhibited forms of SO.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Direct detection of the proton-containing group coordinated to Mo(V) in the high pH form of chicken liver sulfite oxidase by refocused primary ESEEM spectroscopy: Structural and mechanistic implications [J].
Astashkin, AV ;
Mader, ML ;
Pacheco, A ;
Enemark, JH ;
Raitsimring, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 122 (22) :5294-5302
[2]   Pulsed EPR studies of nonexchangeable protons near the Mo(V) center of sulfite oxidase:: Direct detection of the α-proton of the coordinated cysteinyl residue and structural implications for the active site [J].
Astashkin, AV ;
Raitsimring, AM ;
Feng, CJ ;
Johnson, JL ;
Rajagopalan, KV ;
Enemark, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 124 (21) :6109-6118
[3]  
BORBAT PP, 1994, 36 ROCK MOUNT C AN C, P94
[4]   The kinetic behavior of chicken liver sulfite oxidase [J].
Brody, MS ;
Hille, R .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 38 (20) :6668-6677
[5]  
Coughlan M.P., 1980, MOLYBDENUM MOLYBDENU, P243
[6]   NEW PULSE ENDOR TECHNIQUE [J].
DAVIES, ER .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1974, A 47 (01) :1-2
[7]  
DIKANOV SA, 1992, ELECT SPIN ECHO ENVE, P412
[8]   X-ray absorption spectroscopy of chicken sulfite oxidase crystals [J].
George, GN ;
Pickering, IJ ;
Kisker, C .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1999, 38 (10) :2539-+
[9]  
Grupp A., 1990, MODERN PULSED CONTIN, P195
[10]   Molecular basis of sulfite oxidase deficiency from the structure of sulfite oxidase [J].
Kisker, C ;
Schindelin, H ;
Pacheco, A ;
Wehbi, WA ;
Garrett, RM ;
Rajagopalan, KV ;
Enemark, JH ;
Rees, DC .
CELL, 1997, 91 (07) :973-983