Evaluation of pseudoenhancement of renal cysts during contrast-enhanced CT

被引:57
作者
Coulam, CH [1 ]
Sheafor, DH [1 ]
Leder, RA [1 ]
Paulson, EK [1 ]
DeLong, DM [1 ]
Nelson, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740493
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate renal cyst pseudoenhancement during helical CT in a phantom model and in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Iodine baths containing water-filled spheres and cylinders were constructed to simulate cysts in enhancing renal parenchyma. Iodine concentration, cyst size and location, collimation, and peak kilovoltage were varied and cyst attenuation was measured. Data were analyzed with the mixed linear models and Mantel-Haenszel tests. Subsequently, a paired t test compared CT attenuation values before and after contrast material enhancement in 40 patients with 68 renal cysts (radiographic stability >3 months). RESULTS. The attenuation values of phantom cysts increased when placed in a contrast media bath (p = 0.001). The increase in attenuation values became more pronounced with increasing iodine concentrations, decreasing peak kilovoltage, and smaller sphere sizes. In patients, mean cyst attenuation increased 3.4 +/- 6.2 H after administration of contrast material (p = 0.00002). The attenuation did not increase more than 10 H in any of the 37 cysts larger than 2 cm found in patients. Eight (26%) of the 31 cysts smaller than 2 cm found in patients increased by at least 10 H. CONCLUSION. In a phantom model, at simulated physiologic levels of renal enhancement, cysts may pseudoenhance by more than 10 H. Similarly, in patients, cysts may also pseudoenhance; however, most pseudoenhancement does not exceed 10 H. In patients, pseudoenhancement of at least 10 H is more likely in cysts smaller than 2 cm.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 498
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONS ON THE GROWTH OF RENAL NEOPLASMS [J].
BIRNBAUM, BA ;
BOSNIAK, MA ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
LUBAT, E ;
GORDON, RB .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) :695-701
[2]   Multiphasic renal CT: Comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Jacobs, JE ;
Ramchandani, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (03) :753-758
[3]  
BOSKIAK MA, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V198, P638
[4]  
BOSNIAK MA, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V158, P1
[5]   SPIRAL CT - DECREASED SPATIAL-RESOLUTION INVIVO DUE TO BROADENING OF SECTION-SENSITIVITY PROFILE [J].
BRINK, JA ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
BALFE, DM ;
SAGEL, SS ;
DICROCE, J ;
VANNIER, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (02) :469-474
[6]   BEAM HARDENING IN X-RAY RECONSTRUCTIVE TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BROOKS, RA ;
DICHIRO, G .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1976, 21 (03) :390-398
[7]  
DICHIRO G, 1978, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V2, P65
[8]   FDG PET characterization of renal masses: Preliminary experience [J].
Goldberg, MA ;
MayoSmith, WW ;
Papanicolaou, N ;
Fischman, AJ ;
Lee, MJ .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (07) :510-515
[9]   Diagnostic value of MR imaging in comparison to CT in the detection and differential diagnosis of renal masses: ROC analysis [J].
Kreft, BP ;
MullerMiny, H ;
Sommer, T ;
Steudel, A ;
Vahlensieck, M ;
Novak, D ;
Muller, BG ;
Schild, HH .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (04) :542-547
[10]   Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: Beam-hardening effects on CT numbers [J].
Maki, DD ;
Birnbaum, BA ;
Chakraborty, DP ;
Jacobs, JE ;
Carvalho, BM ;
Herman, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) :468-472