Thalidomide and thalidomide analogues for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease
被引:18
作者:
Akobeng, Anthony K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Booth Hall Childrens Hosp, Cent Manchester Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
Manchester Childrens Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, EnglandBooth Hall Childrens Hosp, Cent Manchester Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
Akobeng, Anthony K.
[1
,2
]
Stokkers, Pieter C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Acad Med Hosp AMC Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, NetherlandsBooth Hall Childrens Hosp, Cent Manchester Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
Stokkers, Pieter C.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Booth Hall Childrens Hosp, Cent Manchester Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Childrens Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
[3] Acad Med Hosp AMC Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
Background Maintenance of remission is a major issue in the management of Crohn's disease. Thalidomide, a tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor and its analogue, lenalidomide, may have a role in the management of Crohn's disease, but it is not clear whether it is an effective maintenance therapy. Objectives To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thalidomide and lenalidomide for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Search strategy MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (1984 to September 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2008) and the IBD/FBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register were searched to identify relevant studies. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials which compared thalidomide with either placebo or an active comparator were considered for inclusion. Data collection and analysis No trials met the inclusion criteria. Main results No studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were found. In the absence of any suitable randomised controlled trial in this area, no analysis was performed. Author conclusions There is no evidence to support or refute the use of thalidomide or its analogue, lenalidomide, as maintenance therapy for patients with Crohn's disease. Given the teratogenic nature of thalidomide its use for maintenance therapy is difficult to justify. Well designed clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in Crohn's disease and its use is not recommended until these data are available.