Movement disorder society task force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations

被引:1761
作者
Goetz, CG [1 ]
Poewe, W [1 ]
Rascol, O [1 ]
Sampaio, C [1 ]
Stebbins, GT [1 ]
Counsell, C [1 ]
Giladi, N [1 ]
Holloway, RG [1 ]
Moore, CG [1 ]
Wenning, GK [1 ]
Yahr, MD [1 ]
Seidl, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Hoehn and Yahr scale; Parkinson's disease; rating scales; clinimetrics;
D O I
10.1002/mds.20213
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Movement Disorder Society Task Force for Rating Scales for Parkinson's disease (PD) prepared a critique of the Hoehn and Yahr scale (HY). Strengths of the HY scale include its wide utilization and acceptance. Progressively higher stages correlate with neuroimaging studies of dopaminergic loss, and high correlations exist between the HY scale and some standardized scales of motor impairment, disability, and quality of life. Weaknesses include the scale's mixing of impairment and disability and its non-linearity. Because the HY scale is weighted heavily toward postural instability as the primary index of disease severity, it does not capture completely impairments or disability from other motor features of PD and gives no information on nonmotor problems. Direct clinimetric testing of the HY scale has been very limited, but the scale fulfills at least some criteria for reliability and validity, especially for the midranges of the scale (Stages 2-4). Although a "modified HY scale" that includes 0.5 increments has been adopted widely, no clinimetric data are available on this adaptation. The Task Force recommends that: (1) the HY scale be used in its original form for demographic presentation of patient groups; (2) when the HY scale is used for group description, medians and ranges should be reported and analysis of changes should use nonparametric methods; (3) in research settings, the HY scale is useful primarily for defining inclusion/exclusion criteria; (4) to retain simplicity, clinicians should "rate what you see" and therefore incorporate comorbidities when assigning a HY stage; and (5) because of the wide usage of the modified HY scale with 0.5 increments, this adaptation warrants clinimetric testing. Without such testing, however, the original five-point scales should be maintained. (C) 2004 Movement Disorder Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1028
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale [J].
Bird, SB ;
Dickson, EW .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) :639-643
[2]   A METHOD FOR EVALUATING DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
CANTER, GJ ;
DELATORRE, R ;
MIER, M .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1961, 133 (02) :143-147
[3]   EVALUATING THE EVALUATIONS - OR HOW TO WEIGH THE SCALES OF PARKINSONIAN DISABILITY [J].
DIAMOND, SG ;
MARKHAM, CH .
NEUROLOGY, 1983, 33 (08) :1098-1099
[4]  
EIDELBERG D, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P378
[5]  
Fahn S, 1987, Recent Dev. Park. Dis, P153
[6]   INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY BETWEEN NEUROLOGISTS IN TRAINING OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE RATING-SCALES - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
GEMINIANI, G ;
CESANA, BM ;
TAMMA, F ;
CONTRI, P ;
PACCHETTI, C ;
CARELLA, F ;
PIOLTI, R ;
MARTIGNONI, E ;
GIOVANNINI, P ;
GIROTTI, F ;
CARACENI, T .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1991, 6 (04) :330-335
[7]   EVALUATION OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE - RELIABILITY OF 3 RATING-SCALES [J].
GINANNESCHI, A ;
DEGL'INNOCENTI, F ;
MAGNOLFI, S ;
MAURELLO, MT ;
CATARZI, L ;
MARINI, P ;
AMADUCCI, L .
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 7 (01) :38-41
[8]   EVALUATION OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A NEW APPROACH TO DISABILITY [J].
GINANNESCHI, A ;
DEGL'INNOCENTI, F ;
MAURELLO, MT ;
MAGNOLFI, S ;
MARINI, P ;
AMADUCCI, L .
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 10 (5-6) :282-287
[9]   PROGRESSION OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE WITHOUT LEVODOPA [J].
GOETZ, CG ;
TANNER, CM ;
SHANNON, KM .
NEUROLOGY, 1987, 37 (04) :695-698
[10]   The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): Status and recommendations [J].
Goetz, CG ;
Poewe, W ;
Rascol, O ;
Sampaio, C ;
Stebbins, GT ;
Fahn, S ;
Lang, AE ;
Martinez-Martin, P ;
Tilley, B ;
Van Hilten, B ;
Kleczka, C ;
Seidl, L .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2003, 18 (07) :738-750