Two versions of the contrasting-groups standard-setting method: A review

被引：7

作者：

Brandon, PR ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Curriculum Res & Dev Grp, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA

来源：

MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT | 2002年 / 35卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/07481756.2002.12069061

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

This article reviews the literature on the contrasting-groups standard-setting method and describes 2 versions of the method-the person-focused version and the response-focused version. Of the 2, the response-focused version is preferable. It can be enhanced by adopting some practices of the modified Angoff method.

引用

页码：167 / 181

页数：15

共 38 条

[1]

Angoff W.H., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT, V2nd, P508

[2]

[Anonymous], ED MEASUREMENT ISSUE

[3]

Bacharach S., 1980, POWER POLITICS ORG

[4]

BARON JB, 1981, M NAT COUNC MEAS ED

[5]

BERK RA, 1986, REV EDUC RES, V56, P137, DOI 10.3102/00346543056001137

[6]

BRANDON PR, 2002, UNPUB REV LIT STEPS

[7] SETTING CUTOFF SCORES - LEGAL, PSYCHOMETRIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES AND GUIDELINES [J].

CASCIO, WF ;

ALEXANDER, RA ;

BARRETT, GV .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (01) :1-24

[8]

CIZEK GJ, 1997, M AM ED RES ASS CHIC

[9]

CLAUSER BE, 1994, ACAD MED SRIME, V69, P542

[10]

CLAUSER BE, 1998, M AM ED RES ASS SAN

← 1 2 3 4 →