The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach

被引:90
作者
Cazavan-Jeny, Anne [1 ]
Jeanjean, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] ESSEC Business Sch, Dept Accounting & Management Control, F-95021 Cergy Pontoise, France
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09638180500510384
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Accounting for R&D costs is an open issue. SFAS N degrees 2 mandates that all R&D costs must be immediately expensed. IAS 38 requires capitalization of R&D costs if they meet certain criteria. Recent research papers show the value relevance of capitalized R&D. We test the value relevance of R&D reporting in a sample of 197 French firms between 1993 and 2002. The French context provides an interesting field for R&D value relevance studies because both accounting treatments of R&D costs (expensing and capitalization) are allowed. Unlike previous studies, we find that capitalized R&D is negatively associated with stock prices and returns. This negative coefficient on capitalized R&D implies that investors are concerned with and react negatively to capitalization of R&D. We also find that the firms choosing to capitalize (successful) R&D are smaller, more highly leveraged, less profitable and have less growth opportunities. Taking into account these characteristics, our robustness checks confirm that capitalized R&D is not associated with higher prices and is related to lower returns.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 61
页数:25
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains [J].
Aboody, D ;
Lev, B .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (06) :2747-2766
[2]   The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization [J].
Aboody, D ;
Lev, B .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1998, 36 :161-191
[3]   Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data [J].
Ali, A ;
Hwang, LS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (01) :1-21
[4]  
Barth M.E., 1996, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V13, P527, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.TB00514.X
[5]   The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view [J].
Barth, ME ;
Beaver, WH ;
Landsman, WR .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (1-3) :77-104
[6]  
Boon J. P., 2001, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, V20, P97
[7]  
Callimaci A., 2004, Canadian Accounting Perspective, V3, P33, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1506/V5LY-4CNE-3J0Q-00HN, DOI 10.1506/V5LY-4CNE-3J0Q-00HN]
[8]   The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures [J].
Chan, LKC ;
Lakonishok, J ;
Sougiannis, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2431-2456
[9]  
Demski J.S., 1973, ACCOUNT REV, V48, P718
[10]  
DING Y, 2003, ABACUS, V39, P42