Performance comparison using the GUESS mixture to evaluate counter-current chromatography instruments

被引:46
作者
Guzlek, Hacer [1 ]
Wood, Philip Leslie [1 ]
Janaway, Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Dynam Extract Ltd, Slough SL1 4LP, Berks, England
关键词
Counter-current chromatography; HPCCC; HSCCC; J-type centrifuge; Performance comparison; Mass transfer; STATIONARY-PHASE RETENTION; INDUSTRIAL SCALE-UP; PURIFICATION; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; CCC;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2009.02.091
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Comparing the performance of different counter-current chromatography (CCC) J-type centrifuges has and will always be difficult. This is Clue to the number of variables such as speed of rotation, Swung radius, beta-value, column bore, column length that can be chosen during the design of an instrument. This situation is further complicated by the implication that some of these variables are intrinsically linked, such that if one is changed another or others can also change. The chromatographer has 110 influence on these hardware parameters once the instrument designer has chosen them. However, the chromatographer wants a CCC column that retains the most liquid stationary phase in order to achieve the best separation of the components in a mixture. What matters most is Column performance in terms of: sample loading per injection, speed of separation, purity of target and yield of target. The instrument that has the best performance in all these areas is called a "high-performance" CCC system. This paper demonstrates to the modern chromatographer that a "high-performance" CCC instrument has shorter, lower Volume columns that are rotated faster to provide quicker separations, even with the same sample loading. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4181 / 4186
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Using the liquid nature of the stationary phase: The elution-extrusion method [J].
Berthod, A ;
Hassoun, M ;
Harris, G .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 28 (12-13) :1851-1866
[2]   Test to evaluate countercurrent chromatographs - Liquid stationary phase retention and chromatographic resolution [J].
Berthod, A ;
Billardello, B .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 902 (02) :323-335
[3]  
Conway WD., 1990, COUNTER CURRENT CHRO
[4]   Separation of epigallocatechin gallate and gallocatechin gallate using multiple instruments connected in series [J].
Du, QZ ;
Ke, CQ ;
Ito, Y .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 1998, 21 (1-2) :203-208
[5]   Separation and purification of glucosinolates from crude plant homogenates by high-speed counter-current chromatography [J].
Fahey, JW ;
Wade, KL ;
Stephenson, KK ;
Chou, FE .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 996 (1-2) :85-93
[6]   Retention of the stationary phase in a coil planet centrifuge:: Effects of interfacial tension, density difference, and viscosities of liquid phases [J].
Fedotov, PS ;
Thiébaut, D .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 1998, 21 (1-2) :39-51
[7]   Technology transfer and scale up of a potential cancer-preventive plant dynamic extraction of glucoraphanin [J].
Fisher, D ;
Garrard, IJ ;
van den Heuvel, R ;
Sutherland, IA ;
Chou, FE ;
Fahey, JW .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 28 (12-13) :1913-1922
[8]   GUESS - A generally useful estimate of solvent systems in CCC [J].
Friesen, JB ;
Pauli, GF .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 28 (17) :2777-2806
[9]   Golden rules and pitfalls in selecting optimum conditions for high-speed counter-current chromatography [J].
Ito, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1065 (02) :145-168
[10]   A comparative study of upright counter-current chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography for preparative isolation and purification of phenolic compounds from Magnoliae officinalis [J].
Lu, YB ;
Sun, CR ;
Pan, YJ .
JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2006, 29 (03) :351-357