Both baseline HIV-1 drug resistance and antiretroviral drug levels are associated with short-term virologic responses to salvage therapy

被引:42
作者
Baxter, JD
Merigan, TC
Wentworth, DN
Neaton, JD
Hoover, ML
Hoetelmans, RMW
Piscitelli, SC
Verbiest, WHA
Mayers, DL
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Cooper Hosp, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr AIDS Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Adv Biomed Labs, Cinnaminson, NJ USA
[5] Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
HIV drug resistance/resistance mutations; pharmacokinetics/drug interactions; antiretroviral therapy; viral load;
D O I
10.1097/00002030-200205240-00006
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: To determine the impact of HIV-1 drug resistance at baseline and antiretroviral drug levels (DL) during follow-up on virologic response to the next antiretroviral regimen. Methods: Baseline genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility was obtained for plasma virus from patients failing a protease inhibitor-containing regimen. Untimed plasma antiretroviral DL were performed and the distribution of DL after 12 weeks of followup was classified as above (DI-High) or below (DLLs,) the median. Inhibitory quotients [IQ = (DL at week 12)/fold change in IC50 to wild-type)] were determined for each drug in the regimen. Primary outcome was change in log(10) plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (AVL) from baseline to 12 weeks. Results: There were 137 patients who had baseline resistance data available for the antiretroviral drugs used in the salvage regimen, and DL at week 12. Each drug with DLHigh was associated with DeltaVL = -0.40 (P = 0.0002) while each drug with DILL., had AVL = -0.16 (P = 0.11). In multivariate models AVL associated with each active drug (defined by genotype) with DLHigh was -0.48 log(10) (P < 0.0001), and with each active drug with DLLow was -0.22 (P = 0.03). The AVL was -0.18 if no drugs in the regimen had an IQ > median, compared to -0.58 for one drug, -1.06 for two drugs, -0.86 for three drugs, and -1.44 for four or five drugs with IQ > median (P < 0.0001 for trend). Conclusions: In salvage therapy, both the number of active drugs and the DL for each drug in the new regimen determine the antiviral response. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1138
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Indinavir concentrations and antiviral effect
    Acosta, EP
    Henry, K
    Baken, L
    Page, LM
    Fletcher, CV
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (06): : 708 - 712
  • [2] A randomized study of antiretroviral management based on plasma genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in patients failing therapy
    Baxter, JD
    Mayers, DL
    Wentworth, DN
    Neaton, JD
    Hoover, ML
    Winters, MA
    Mannheimer, SB
    Thompson, MA
    Abrams, DI
    Brizz, BJ
    Ioannidis, JPA
    Merigan, TC
    [J]. AIDS, 2000, 14 (09) : F83 - F93
  • [3] Burger DM, 1998, ANTIVIR THER, V3, P215
  • [4] BURGER DM, 2001, 2 INT WORKSH CLIN PH
  • [5] Clevenbergh P, 2000, ANTIVIR THER, V5, P65
  • [6] CLEVENBERGH P, 2001, 8 C RETR OPP INF CHI
  • [7] COHEN C, 2000, ANTIVIR THER S, V5, P67
  • [8] Importance of protease inhibitor plasma levels in HIV-infected patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy: pharmacological data from the Viradapt Study
    Durant, J
    Clevenbergh, P
    Garraffo, R
    Halfon, P
    Icard, S
    Del Giudice, P
    Montagne, N
    Schapiro, JM
    Dellamonica, P
    [J]. AIDS, 2000, 14 (10) : 1333 - 1339
  • [9] Drug-resistance genotyping in HIV-1 therapy: the VIRADAPT randomised controlled trial
    Durant, J
    Clevenbergh, P
    Halfon, P
    Delgiudice, P
    Porsin, S
    Simonet, P
    Montagne, N
    Boucher, CAB
    Schapiro, JM
    Dellamonica, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9171) : 2195 - 2199
  • [10] FLETCHER CV, 2001, 8 C RETR OPP INF