Human-specific insertions and deletions inferred from mammalian genome sequences

被引:57
作者
Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chueng-Jong
Li, Wen-Hsiung [1 ]
Chuang, Trees-Juen
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Genomics Res Ctr, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
[2] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, Miaoli 350, Taiwan
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.5429606
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that insertions and deletions (indels) have contributed to the sequence divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes more than do nucleotide changes (3% vs. 1.2%). However, although there have been studies of large indels between the two genomes, no systematic analysis of small indels (i.e., indels <= 100 bp) has been published. In this study, we first estimated that the false- positive rate of small indels inferred from human - chimpanzee pairwise sequence alignments is quite high, suggesting that the chimpanzee genome draft is not sufficiently accurate for our purpose. We have therefore inferred only human-specific indels using multiple sequence alignments of mammalian genomes. We identified > 840,000 "small" indels, which affect > 7000 UCSC-annotated human genes (> 11,000 transcripts). These indels, however, amount to only similar to 0.21% sequence change in the human lineage for the regions compared, whereas in pseudogenes indels contribute to a sequence divergence of 1.40%, suggesting that most of the indels that occurred in genic regions have been eliminated. Functional analysis reveals that the genes whose coding exons have been affected by human-specific indels are enriched in transcription and translation regulatory activities but are underrepresented in catalytic and transporter activities, cellular and physiological processes, and extracellular region/matrix. This functional bias suggests that human-specific indels might have contributed to human unique traits by causing changes at the RNA and protein level.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ashburner M, 2001, GENOME RES, V11, P1425
[2]   Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels [J].
Britten, RJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (21) :13633-13635
[3]   Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees [J].
Chen, FC ;
Li, WH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (02) :444-456
[4]  
*CHIMP SEQ AN CONS, 2005, NATURE, V0437
[5]   Inferring nonneutral evolution from human-chimp-mouse orthologous gene trios [J].
Clark, AG ;
Glanowski, S ;
Nielsen, R ;
Thomas, PD ;
Kejariwal, A ;
Todd, MA ;
Tanenbaum, DM ;
Civello, D ;
Lu, F ;
Murphy, B ;
Ferriera, S ;
Wang, G ;
Zheng, XG ;
White, TJ ;
Sninsky, JJ ;
Adams, MD ;
Cargill, M .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5652) :1960-1963
[6]   Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome [J].
Collins, FS ;
Lander, ES ;
Rogers, J ;
Waterston, RH .
NATURE, 2004, 431 (7011) :931-945
[7]   Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees [J].
Ebersberger, I ;
Metzler, D ;
Schwarz, C ;
Pääbo, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 70 (06) :1490-1497
[8]   Genomic DNA insertions and deletions occur frequently between humans and nonhuman primates [J].
Frazer, KA ;
Chen, XY ;
Hinds, DA ;
Pant, PVK ;
Patil, N ;
Cox, DR .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (03) :341-346
[9]   Genomic rearrangements by LINE-1 insertion-mediated deletion in the human and chimpanzee lineages [J].
Han, KD ;
Sen, SK ;
Wang, JX ;
Callinan, PA ;
Lee, JN ;
Cordaux, R ;
Liang, P ;
Batzer, MA .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (13) :4040-4052
[10]   Functional analysis of human and chimpanzee promoters -: art. no. R57 [J].
Heissig, F ;
Krause, J ;
Bryk, J ;
Khaitovich, P ;
Enard, W ;
Pääbo, S .
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07)