The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients

被引:174
作者
AbuRahma, Ali F. [1 ]
Campbell, John [1 ]
Stone, Patrick A. [1 ]
Nanjundappa, Aravinda [1 ]
Jain, Akhilesh [1 ]
Dean, L. Scott [2 ]
Habib, Joseph [1 ]
Keiffer, Tammi [2 ]
Emmett, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Charleston, WV 25304 USA
[2] Charleston Area Med Ctr, Charleston, WV USA
关键词
AAA REPAIR; ANATOMY; COMPLICATIONS; ANGULATION; SELECTION; EUROSTAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.061
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background: Initially, patients with a short angulated aortic neck were considered unfit for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Recently, however, more liberal use of EVAR has been advocated. This study analyzes the correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 238 patients who underwent EVAR during a recent 7-year period. All patients were followed up clinically and underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound imaging or computed tomography angiography, which were repeated every 6 months. Aortic neck length was classified into >= 15 mm (L1, n = 195), 10 to < 15 mm (L2, n = 24), and <10 mm (L3, n = 17). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate freedom from late endoleak, early and late reintervention, and survival. Results: Analyzed were 49 Ancure, 47 AneuRx, 104 Excluder, and 38 Zenith grafts. The mean follow-up was 24.7 months (range, 1-87 months). The initial technical success was 99%. The perioperative complication rates for groups L1, L2, and L3 were 13%, 21%, and 24%, respectively (P = .289). Proximal type I early endoleaks occurred in 12%, 42%, and 53% in groups L1, L2, and L3, respectively (P < .001). Intraoperative proximal aortic cuffs were needed to seal proximal type I endoleaks in 10%, 38%, and 47% in L1, L2, and L3 groups, respectively (P < .0001). However, the rate of late reintervention was comparable in all groups. Postoperatively, the size of the abdominal aortic aneurysm decreased or remained unchanged in 95%, 94%, and 88% in L1, L2, and L3, respectively (P = .660). Rates of freedom from late type. I endoleak at 1, 2, and 3 years were 84%, 82%, and 80% for L1; 68%, 54%, and 54% for L2; and 71%, 71%, and 53% for L3 (P = .0263). Rates of freedom from late intervention at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96%, 94%, and 92% for L1; and 94%, 83%, and 83% for L2; and 93%, 93%, and 93% for L3 (P = .5334). Conclusions: EVAR can be used for patients with a short aortic neck; however, it was associated with a significantly higher rate of early and late type I endoleaks, resulting in an increased use of proximal aortic cuffs for sealing the endoleaks. (J Vasc Surg 2009;50:738-48.)
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 748
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): An anatomic and device-specific analysis [J].
Abbruzzese, Thomas A. ;
Kwolck, Christopher J. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Chung, Thomas K. ;
Kang, Jeanwan ;
Conrad, Mark F. ;
LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ;
Cambria, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (01) :19-28
[2]
Armon MP, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P178, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02596.x
[3]
Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Carpenter, JP ;
Baum, RA ;
Barker, CF ;
Golden, MA ;
Mitchell, ME ;
Velazquez, OC ;
Fairman, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (06) :1050-1054
[4]
Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[5]
Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy [J].
Choke, Edward ;
Munneke, Graham ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Belli, Anna-Maria ;
Loftus, Ian ;
McFarland, Robert ;
Loosemore, Thomas ;
Thompson, Matthew M. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) :975-980
[6]
Cox Daniel E, 2006, Vasc Endovascular Surg, V40, P35, DOI 10.1177/153857440604000105
[7]
Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? [J].
Dillavou, ED ;
Muluk, SC ;
Rhee, RY ;
Tzeng, E ;
Woody, JD ;
Gupta, N ;
Makaroun, MS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (04) :657-663
[8]
RESECTION OF AN ANEURYSM OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA - REESTABLISHMENT OF THE CONTINUITY BY A PRESERVED HUMAN ARTERIAL GRAFT, WITH RESULT AFTER 5 MONTHS [J].
DUBOST, C ;
ALLARY, M ;
OECONOMOS, N .
AMA ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1952, 64 (03) :405-408
[9]
Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks [J].
Fairman, RM ;
Velazquez, OC ;
Carpenter, JP ;
Woo, E ;
Baum, RA ;
Golden, MA ;
Kritpracha, B ;
Criado, F .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (06) :1074-1082
[10]
Rupture of infra-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: A series from EUROSTAR registry [J].
Fransen, GAJ ;
Vallabhaneni, SR ;
van Marrewijk, CJ ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Harris, PL ;
Buth, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (05) :487-493