The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review

被引:263
作者
Coretti, Silvia [1 ]
Ruggeri, Matteo [2 ]
McNamee, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Dr Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Fac Econ, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland
关键词
EQ-5D; smallest worthwhile effect; minimum relevant difference; review; minimum clinically important difference; Euro QoL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; HEALTH STATE; UTILITY MEASURES; RESPONSIVENESS; PAIN; DISABILITY; DISEASE; FUSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1586/14737167.2014.894462
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is the most common instrument to value health outcomes under the patient's perspective. Several studies have investigated whether observed changes are meaningful to patients, using a variety of approaches to estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). This study provides an overview of the state of art of the estimation of the MCID for the three-level EQ-5D index based on the UK scoring algorithm, critically assessing the available evidence. The interest in estimation of MCID for the EQ-5D has been increasing in recent years. However, some additional standardization in the estimation procedures may be of value, in order to enhance the ability to make comparisons across measures and disease areas. Further methodological research might also contribute to reducing gaps between theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 233
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Sufficiently important difference: Expanding the framework of clinical significance [J].
Barrett, B ;
Brown, D ;
Mundt, M ;
Brown, R .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (03) :250-261
[2]
How do the EQ-5D, SF-6D and the well-being rating scale compare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? [J].
Boonen, Annelies ;
van der Heijde, Desiree ;
Landewe, Robert ;
van Tubergen, Astrid ;
Mielants, Herman ;
Dougados, Maxime ;
van der Linden, Sjef .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 (06) :771-777
[3]
Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[4]
Dolan P, 2000, HANDB ECON, V17, P1723
[5]
A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain [J].
Ferreira, Manuela L. ;
Herbert, Robert D. ;
Ferreira, Paulo H. ;
Latimer, Jane ;
Ostelo, Raymond W. ;
Nascimento, Dafne P. ;
Smeets, Rob J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03) :253-261
[6]
People with low back pain typically need to feel 'much better' to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study [J].
Ferreira, Manuela Loureiro ;
Ferreira, Paulo Henrique ;
Herbert, Robert Dale ;
Latimer, Jane .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2009, 55 (02) :123-127
[7]
Guyatt Gordon, 2004, ACP J Club, V140, pA11
[8]
The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it [J].
Impellizzeri, F. M. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Naal, F. D. ;
Hersche, O. ;
Leunig, M. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (07) :638-645
[9]
MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[10]
DETERMINING A MINIMAL IMPORTANT CHANGE IN A DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
JUNIPER, EF ;
GUYATT, GH ;
WILLAN, A ;
GRIFFITH, LE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :81-87