Growth opportunities and corporate debt policy: the case of the US defense industry

被引:94
作者
Goyal, VK
Lehn, K [1 ]
Racic, S
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Katz Grad Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
capital structure; debt policy; payout policy; growth opportunities;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00070-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The U.S. defense industry provides a natural experiment for examining how changes in growth opportunities affect the level and structure of corporate debt. The growth opportunities of defense firms, compared with other firms, increased substantially during the Reagan defense buildup of the early 1980s but then declined significantly with the end of the cold war and associated defense budget cuts in the late 1980s and early 1990s. We examine how the level and Structure of corporate debt changed for a sample of 61 defense firms and a benchmark sample of 61 manufacturing firms during 1980-95, a period spanning the changes in growth opportunities. The debt levels of weapons manufacturers, which were most affected by the changes in growth opportunities, increased significantly as their growth opportunities declined. In addition, these firms lengthened the maturity structure of their debt, decreased the ratio of private to public debt, and decreased the use of senior debt as their growth opportunities declined. The results complement other studies that have found cross-sectional relations between proxies for growth opportunities and leverage variables and validate the prominent role played by growth opportunities in the theory of corporate finance. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 59
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   GROWTH, CORPORATE-POLICIES, AND THE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET [J].
BAKER, GP .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1993, 16 (1-3) :161-165
[2]   THE MATURITY STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE-DEBT [J].
BARCLAY, MJ ;
SMITH, CW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1995, 50 (02) :609-631
[3]  
BARCLAY MJ, 1995, J FINANC, V50, P899, DOI 10.2307/2329292
[4]   A RATIONALE FOR DEBT MATURITY STRUCTURE AND CALL PROVISIONS IN THE AGENCY THEORETIC FRAMEWORK [J].
BARNEA, A ;
HAUGEN, RA ;
SENBET, LW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1980, 35 (05) :1223-1234
[5]   AN INVESTIGATION OF COST DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC SALES AND PRIVATE PLACEMENTS OF DEBT [J].
BLACKWELL, DW ;
KIDWELL, DS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 22 (02) :253-278
[6]   ON THE RELEVANCE OF DEBT MATURITY STRUCTURE [J].
BRICK, IE ;
RAVID, SA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1985, 40 (05) :1423-1437
[7]   INVESTMENT OPTIONS, ASSETS IN PLACE, AND THE RISK OF STOCKS [J].
CHUNG, KH ;
CHAROENWONG, C .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1991, 20 (03) :21-33
[8]   AN ANALYSIS OF INTERTEMPORAL AND CROSS-SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF EARNINGS RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS [J].
COLLINS, DW ;
KOTHARI, SP .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1989, 11 (2-3) :143-181
[9]  
Diamond Doug, 1991, J POLITICAL EC, V99, P688
[10]   SENIORITY AND MATURITY OF DEBT CONTRACTS [J].
DIAMOND, DW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 33 (03) :341-368