Impact of learning curve in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on margin status: Prospective study of first 100 procedures performed by one surgeon

被引:12
作者
Baumert, H
Fromont, G
Rosa, JA
Cahill, D
Cathelineau, X
Vallancien, G
机构
[1] Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, Dept Pathol, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1089/089277904322959824
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the experience of a single surgeon with his first 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies and determine the impact of the learning curve on the surgical margin status according to the rate of nerve-sparing procedures. Patients and Methods: Between December 2000 and April 2002, 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed by one surgeon without any selection of patients and without the help of any other surgeon. The procedures were divided in four groups of 25 consecutive cases. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of age, clinical and pathological stage, or Gleason score. Nerve-sparing (NS) dissection was performed when the procedure was easy. Positive surgical margins (SM+) were measured and classified according to their location. Results: The overall rate of SM+ was 12.8% in pT2 and 31.8% in pT3 tumors. The SM+ rate was not significantly different among the groups. In contrast, the number of NS dissections (49 patients) increased from group 1 to group 4. Both the postive margin length and the rate of multiple positive margins were significantly lower in the 50 most recent patients. Conclusion: Nerve-sparing surgery was performed with increasing frequency during this learning curve without compromising the surgical margins. The results suggest that experience could lead to a decrease of both the positive margin length and the rate of multiple positive margins. The impact on cancer control and potency is under evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation [J].
Fromont, G ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :661-665
[2]  
Guillonneau B, 2002, J UROLOGY, V167, P343
[3]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The montsouris experience [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (02) :418-422
[4]  
Guillonneau B, 1999, PROSTATE, V39, P71
[5]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
El-Fettouh, H ;
Baumert, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Doublet, JD ;
Fromont, G ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1261-1266
[6]  
Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X
[7]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - The Creteil experience [J].
Hoznek, A ;
Salomon, L ;
Olsson, LE ;
Antiphon, P ;
Saint, F ;
Cicco, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) :38-45
[8]   Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes [J].
Hu, JC ;
Gold, KF ;
Pashas, CL ;
Melhto, SS ;
Litwin, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) :401-405
[9]   Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Katz, R ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
de la Taille, A ;
Vordos, D ;
Cicco, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) :2078-2082
[10]   CAPSULAR PENETRATION IN PROSTATE-CANCER - SIGNIFICANCE FOR NATURAL-HISTORY AND TREATMENT [J].
MCNEAL, JE ;
VILLERS, AA ;
REDWINE, EA ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1990, 14 (03) :240-247