Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: a comparison between Australia and the rest of the world

被引:17
作者
Gorjiara, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baldock, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Fac Sci, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Radiat Oncol, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
关键词
Nanoscience and nanotechnology; Scientometric; Lexical query; Australia; SEARCH STRATEGY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; JOURNALS; PATENTS; TERMS; CHINA; DELINEATION; CATEGORIES; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-014-1287-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Nanoscience and nanotechnology are research areas of a multidisciplinary nature. Having a good knowledge of the rapidly evolving nature of these research areas is important to understand the research paths, as well as national and global developments in these areas. Accordingly, in this reported study nanoscience and nanotechnology research undertaken globally was compared with that of Australia by way of analyzing research publications. Initially, four different bibliometric Boolean-based search methodologies were used to analyze publications in the Web of Science database (Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Knowledge). These methodologies were (a) lexical query, (b) search in nanoscience and nanotechnology journals, (c) combination of lexical query and journal search and (d) search in the ten nano-journals with the highest impact factors. Based on results obtained, the third methodology was found to be the most comprehensive approach. Consequently, this search methodology was used to compare global and Australian nanoscience and nanotechnology publications for the period 1988-2000. Results demonstrated that depending on the search technique used, Australia ranks fourteenth to seventeenth internationally with a higher than world average number of nanoscience and nanotechnology publications. Over the last decade, Australia showed a relative growth rate in nanoscience and nanotechnology publications of 16 % compared to 12 % for the rest of the world. Researchers from China, the USA and the UK are from the main countries that collaborate with Australian researchers in nanoscience and nanotechnology publications.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 148
页数:28
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NAT NAN STRAT ANN RE
[2]   Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs [J].
Arora, Sanjay K. ;
Porter, Alan L. ;
Youtie, Jan ;
Shapira, Philip .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (01) :351-370
[3]  
Australian Academy of Science, 2012, NAT NAN RES STRAT
[4]  
Australian Academy of Science, 2009, NAN AUSTR TRENDS APP
[5]  
Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, 2013, ATSE SUBM AUSTR AS C
[6]   Evolutionary paths of change of emerging nanotechnological innovation systems: the case of ZnO nanostructures [J].
Avila-Robinson, Alfonso ;
Miyazaki, Kumiko .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (03) :829-849
[7]   A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective [J].
Bajwa, R. S. ;
Yaldram, K. ;
Rafique, S. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (01) :333-342
[8]   Research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan scenario [J].
Bajwa, R. S. ;
Yaldram, K. .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (02)
[9]   Impact and structure of literature on nanoparticle generation by laser ablation in liquids [J].
Barcikowski, Stephan ;
Devesa, Francisco ;
Moldenhauer, Kirsten .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (08) :1883-1893
[10]   China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race [J].
Bhattacharya, Sujit ;
Shilpa ;
Bhati, Madhulika .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 93 (01) :59-87