Larval behavior of Drosophila central complex mutants: Interactions between no bridge, foraging, and chaser

被引:27
作者
Varnam, CJ
Strauss, R
DeBelle, JS
Sokolowski, MB
机构
[1] YORK UNIV,DEPT BIOL,N YORK,ON M3J 1P3,CANADA
[2] MAX PLANCK INST BIOL CYBERNET,D-72076 TUBINGEN,GERMANY
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
brain mutants; protocerebral bridge; foraging; walking;
D O I
10.3109/01677069609107065
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The central complex (CC) is a prominent component of the adult insect brain. In Drosophila melanogaster, mutations which alter CC structure also impair adult locomotion. This has led to the suggestion that the CC functions as a higher organizer of adult locomotor patterns (Strauss and Heisenberg, 1993). In the present study, we describe altered larval behavior resulting from mutations in six CC structural genes. Differences from the control strain were found for larvae from each CC mutant strain in at least one of three assays. central body defect(1) (cbd(1)), central complex deranged(1) (ccd(1)), central brain deranged(1) (ceb(1)) and central complex(1) (cex(1)) larvae all had general defects in locomotion (on a non-nutritive agar surface). Both ellipsoid body open(2) (ebo(2)) and no bridge(1) (nob(1)) had larval foraging behavior defects (on a nutritive yeast surface). Only cex(1) larvae required significantly longer time in a roil over assay of muscle tone. Genetic analysis suggested that nob(1) interacts additively with two other genes influencing larval foraging behavior, foraging (for) and Chaser (Car). Sor also had an influence on adult foraging, whereas here we found that Csr did not. We did not include adult foraging behavior tests of the CC mutants due to general locomotion defects in these flies (Strauss and Heisenberg, 1993).
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 115
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A MUTATION AFFECTING LARVAL MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
BALL, E ;
BALL, SP ;
SPARROW, JC .
DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS, 1985, 6 (02) :77-92
[2]   IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL AND LEARNING-STUDIES OF A DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER NEUROLOGICAL MUTANT, NO-BRIDGE(KS49) AS AN APPROACH TO THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF THE CENTRAL COMPLEX [J].
BOUHOUCHE, A ;
VAYSSE, G ;
CORBIERE, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 1993, 9 (02) :105-121
[3]   HEREDITY OF ROVER SITTER - ALTERNATIVE FORAGING STRATEGIES OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER LARVAE [J].
DEBELLE, JS ;
SOKOLOWSKI, MB .
HEREDITY, 1987, 59 :73-83
[4]  
DEBELLE JS, 1989, GENETICS, V123, P157
[5]   Expression of Drosophila mushroom body mutations in alternative genetic backgrounds: A case study of the mushroom body miniature gene (mbm) [J].
deBelle, JS ;
Heisenberg, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (18) :9875-9880
[6]   GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF THE FORAGING MICROREGION OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
DEBELLE, JS ;
SOKOLOWSKI, MB ;
HILLIKER, AJ .
GENOME, 1993, 36 (01) :94-101
[7]  
GOLL WOLFGANG, 1967, Z MORPHOL OKOL TIERE, V59, P143, DOI 10.1007/BF00407612
[8]   ANATOMY OF OCELLAR INTERNEURONS OF ACRIDID GRASSHOPPERS .2. SMALL INTERNEURONS [J].
GOODMAN, CS ;
WILLIAMS, JLD .
CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 1976, 175 (02) :203-225
[9]   ROVER SITTER DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER LARVAL FORAGING POLYMORPHISM AS A FUNCTION OF LARVAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD-PATCH QUALITY, AND STARVATION [J].
GRAF, SA ;
SOKOLOWSKI, MB .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 1989, 2 (03) :301-313
[10]   NEURONAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE CENTRAL COMPLEX IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
HANESCH, U ;
FISCHBACH, KF ;
HEISENBERG, M .
CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 1989, 257 (02) :343-366