Breast cancer screening and management

被引:3
作者
Forrest, APM
Anderson, EDC
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Clin & Surg Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh Breast Unit, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123752.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mammographic screening to detect preclinical cancer was introduced when it was realised that once breast cancer became symptomatic it could not be cured regularly by local surgery, as early systemic dissemination had almost invariably occurred. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of screened versus unscreened women has demonstrated a mortality benefit approaching 30% in screened women (> 50 years of age) seven to nine years from the start of the trials. The UK and Australian breast screening programs are compared. Differences in the design are largely a result of differences in the healthcare systems in the two countries. Breast self-examination, although still recommended by many Australian practitioners, is not an appropriate screening method, as it does not affect breast cancer death rates. About 5% of women have familiar breast cancer : (associated with mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2). Women at high risk are screened at an earlier age and at more frequent intervals. Current best practice management of screen-detected : breast cancer, including surgery, radiotherapy, assessment of the axilla, and systemic therapy, is summarised. Women with symptomatic breast disease ideally should be treated by a specialised multidisciplinary service, which can provide sophisticated diagnosis and treatment as well as supportive care.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[2]   Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Blamey, RW .
BREAST, 1999, 8 (04) :162-168
[3]   14 years of follow-up from the Edinbugh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening [J].
Alexander, FE ;
Anderson, TJ ;
Brown, HK ;
Forrest, APM ;
Hepburn, W ;
Kirkpatrick, AE ;
Muir, BB ;
Prescott, RJ ;
Smith, A .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9168) :1903-1908
[4]  
Anderson TJ, 1999, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V35, P82
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Lancet, V348, P1189
[6]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, BREAST CERV CANC SCR, P3
[7]  
BAKER CB, 1997, BREAST, V6, P229
[8]   THE NOTTINGHAM-PROGNOSTIC-INDEX APPLIED TO 9,149 PATIENTS FROM THE STUDIES OF THE DANISH-BREAST-CANCER-COOPERATIVE-GROUP (DBCG) [J].
BALSLEV, I ;
AXELSSON, CK ;
ZEDELER, K ;
RASMUSSEN, BB ;
CARSTENSEN, B ;
MOURIDSEN, HT .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 32 (03) :281-290
[9]  
BRINKLEY D, 1975, LANCET, V2, P95
[10]  
*CANC RES CAMP REP, 1997, WAY DIAGN SOM CANC E