The incremental costs of recommended therapy versus real world therapy in type 2 diabetes patients

被引:3
作者
Crivera, C.
Suh, D. C.
Huang, E. S.
Cagliero, E.
Grant, R. W.
Vo, L.
Shin, H. C.
Meigs, J. B.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Ernest Mario Sch Pharm, Piscataway, NJ USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Diabet Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
cardiovascular disease; cost studies; disease management; health services research; pharmacoepidemiology; type; 2; diabetes;
D O I
10.1185/030079906X132523
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The goals of diabetes management have evolved over the past decade to become the attainment of near-normal glucose and cardiovascular risk factor levels. Improved metabolic control is achieved through optimized medication regimens, but costs specifically associated with such optimization have not been examined. Objective: To estimate the incremental medication cost of providing optimal therapy to reach recommended goals versus actual therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We randomly selected the charts of 601 type 2 diabetes patients receiving care from the outpatient clinics of Massachusetts General Hospital March 1, 1996-August 31, 1997 and abstracted clinical and medication data. We applied treatment algorithms based on 2004 clinical practice guidelines for hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension to patients' current medication therapy to determine how current medication regimens could be improved to attain recommended treatment goals. Four clinicians and three pharmacists independently applied the algorithms and reached consensus on recommended therapies. Mean incremental medication costs, the cost differences between current and recommended therapies, per patient (expressed in 2004 dollars) were calculated with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Mean patient age was 65 years old, mean duration of diabetes was 7.7 years, 32% had ideal glucose control, 25% had ideal systolic blood pressure, and 24% had ideal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Care for these density diabetes patients was similar to that observed in recent national studies. If treatment algorithm recommendations were applied, the average annual medication cost/ patient would increase from $1525 to $2164. Annual incremental costs/ patient increased by $168 (95% CI $133 $206) for antihyperglycemic medications, $75 ($57-$93) for antihypertensive medications, $392 ($354-$434) for antihyperlipidemic medications, and $3 ($3-$4) for aspirin prophylaxis. Yearly incremental cost of recommended laboratory testing ranged from $77-$189/ patient. Limitations: Although baseline data come from the clinics of a single academic institution, collected in 1997, the care of these diabetes patients was remarkably similar to care recently observed nationally. In addition, the data are dependent on the medical record and may not accurately reflect patients' actual experiences. Conclusion: Average yearly incremental cost of optimizing drug regimens to achieve recommended treatment goals for type 2 diabetes was approximately $600/ patient. These results provide valuable input for assessing the cost-effectiveness of improving comprehensive diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:2301 / 2311
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*AM DIAB ASS, 1999, DIABETES CARE S1, V22, pS32
[2]  
*AM SOC HLTH SYST, 2002, AM HOSP FORM SERV DR
[3]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2002, DIABETES CARE, V25, P213
[4]  
American Diabetes Association, 2004, DIABETES CARE, V27, pS1
[5]  
[Anonymous], DIABETES CARE
[6]  
Bell DSH, 2002, SOUTH MED J, V95, P24
[7]   Disease management and the organization of physician practice [J].
Casalino, LP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (04) :485-488
[8]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[9]   Recent antihyperglycemic prescribing trends for US privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Cohen, FJ ;
Neslusan, CA ;
Conklin, JE ;
Song, X .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (06) :1847-1851
[10]   Model of Complications of NIDDM .2. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia [J].
Eastman, RC ;
Javitt, JC ;
Herman, WH ;
Dasbach, EJ ;
CopleyMerriman, C ;
Maier, W ;
Dong, F ;
Manninen, D ;
Zbrozek, AS ;
Kotsanos, J ;
Garfield, SA ;
Harris, M .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (05) :735-744