Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes - A Canadian hospital perspective

被引:19
作者
Balen, RM
Marra, CA
Zed, PJ
Cohen, M
Frighetto, L
机构
[1] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Clin Drug Res Program, CSU Pharmaceut Sci, Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Med Coll Penn & Hahnemann Univ, Hahnemann Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199916050-00009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of enoxaparin therapy versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease from the perspective of a Canadian hospital. Design: A predictive decision analysis model using published clinical and economic evaluations and casts of medical care in Canada. Patients: A hypothetical cohort of patients presenting to hospital with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction as defined by the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) trial. Interventions: Two antithrombotic treatment strategies were compared: (i) enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, and (ii) UFH intravenous bolus and constant infusion adjusted to maintain a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time. Both treatment strategies included 100 to 325 mg of oral aspirin daily. Enoxaparin or UFH was continued for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Cumulative outcomes were considered up to 30 days after initial presentation to hospital. Results: At 30 days, 19.8% of patients who received enoxaparin compared with 23.3% of patients who received UFH reached one of the primary composite events. There was no difference in major bleeding between the 2 treatment groups (6.5% enoxaparin vs 6.8% UFH). The average total direct medical cost per patient was $Can848 with the enoxaparin strategy versus $Can892 with the UFH strategy (1999 values). Therapy with enoxaparin was, therefore, considered to be the dominant strategy. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that the decision model was not robust to changes in the 30-day composite end-point, probability of recurrent angina, or base casts for treatment of recurrent angina or enoxaparin therapy. Conclusion: Enoxaparin is the dominant antithrombotic pharmacotherapeutic strategy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 542
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Management of unstable angina pectoris and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada (the TIMI III registry) [J].
Anderson, HV ;
Gibson, RS ;
Stone, PH ;
Cannon, CP ;
Aguirre, F ;
Thompson, B ;
Knatterud, GL ;
Braunwald, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (11) :1441-1446
[2]   TIMI 11B. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Rationale, study design, and methods [J].
Antman, EM .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 135 (06) :S353-S360
[3]  
Antman EM, 1998, CIRCULATION, V98, P504
[4]  
Braunwald E, 1997, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V29, P1474
[5]  
Braunwald E, 1994, AHCPR PUBLICATION, V94-0602, P1
[6]  
*BRIT COL MED ASS, 1997, BRIT COL MED ASS GUI
[7]   A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease [J].
Cohen, M ;
Demers, C ;
Gurfinkel, EP ;
Turpie, AGG ;
Fromell, GJ ;
Goodman, S ;
Langer, A ;
Califf, RM ;
Fox, KAA ;
Premmereur, J ;
Bigonzi, F .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (07) :447-452
[8]  
Ferguson JJ, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P1217
[9]  
FRIGHETTO L, 1995, HOSP FORMUL, V30, P92
[10]   MECHANISMS LEADING TO MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - INSIGHTS FROM STUDIES OF VASCULAR BIOLOGY [J].
FUSTER, V .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) :2126-2146