A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic efficacy, onset of action, and tolerability of ibuprofen arginate and ibuprofen in postoperative dental pain

被引:57
作者
Black, P
Max, MB
Desjardins, P
Ardia, A
Pallotta, T
机构
[1] Scirex Corp Inc, Austin, TX 78705 USA
[2] NIDCR, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Zambon Grp SpA, Bresso, Italy
关键词
dental pain; pain management; ibuprofen; onset; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(02)80020-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 [药学];
摘要
Background: Because of its enhanced pharmacokinetic characteristics, ibuprofen arginate might be expected to provide faster pain relief than standard ibuprofen formulations in patients experiencing acute pain. Objective: This study assessed the analgesic efficacy, speed of onset, and tolerability of ibuprofen arginate compared with a commercially available form of ibuprofen in patients with postoperative dental pain. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive ibuprofen arginate 200 or 400 mg, ibuprofen 200 or 400 mg, or placebo in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. Patients were observed for 6 hours after administration of a single dose of study medication. A repeated-dose, open-label phase followed. Pain intensity and pain relief were measured using traditional verbal descriptor scales; onset of analgesia was assessed using 2 stopwatches to measure the time to achievement of specific pain relief criteria. Results: A total of 498 patients (219 men, 279 women; mean age, 21.5 years) participated in this study. Baseline pain was moderate in 388 patients (78%) and severe in 110 patients (22%). Meaningful pain relief was reached after a median of 29 and 28 minutes with ibuprofen arginate 200 and 400 mg, respectively, and after 52 and 44 minutes with ibuprofen 200 and 400 mg, respectively (all, P < 0.05). The percentages of patients who achieved meaningful pain relief within the first hour after treatment were 77.6% and 83.7% for ibuprofen arginate 200 and 400 mg, respectively, 61.0% and 63.0% for ibuprofen 200 and 400 mg, respectively, and 39.8% for placebo. The differences between ibuprofen arginate and ibuprofen were statistically significant (both doses, P < 0.05). Significantly greater numbers of patients achieved meaningful pain relief with ibuprofen arginate 400 mg compared with placebo from 20 minutes through 6 hours and with ibuprofen arginate 200 mg from 30 minutes through 6 hours (P < 0.05). Compared with placebo, a greater number of patients achieved meaningful pain relief with ibuprofen 400 mg from 45 minutes through 6 hours; with ibuprofen 200 mg, the corresponding interval was from 1 through 6 hours. After the first hour, pain reduction was similar for the similar doses of the 2 ibuprofen preparations. Median remedication times with both doses of ibuprofen arginate were similar to those with both doses of ibuprofen, ranging from 4.0 to 5.2 hours. Adverse-event profiles were similar between the 2 active medications. Conclusions: Ibuprofen arginate was effective in this population of patients experiencing moderate to severe pain after surgical extraction of >= 1 impacted third molar, with 16 to 24 minutes' faster time to meaningful pain relief than with ibuprofen. The 2 formulations had similar tolerability profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1089
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
*AM MED ASS, 1980, AMA DRUG EV, P79
[2]
[Anonymous], COMPEND CONTIN ED DE
[3]
[Anonymous], 2000, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]
[Anonymous], COMPEND CONTIN ED DE
[5]
IMPACT OF NON-NARCOTIC ORAL ANALGESICS ON PAIN MANAGEMENT [J].
BEAVER, WT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 84 (5A) :3-15
[6]
Ibuprofen arginine vs naproxen sodium as prophylactic oral treatment of pain due to dental surgery - A randomised double-blind double-dummy placebo-controlled multicentre study [J].
Borea, G ;
Monopoli, R ;
Colantoni, A .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1996, 11 :33-40
[7]
Cooper S A, 1986, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V7, P580
[8]
COOPER SA, 1976, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V20, P241
[9]
Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen - The first 30 years [J].
Davies, NM .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1998, 34 (02) :101-154
[10]
Desjardins P. J., 1996, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V59, P130, DOI 10.1038/sj.clpt.1996.21