Focussing on quality of life in treatment

被引:6
作者
McCabe, R [1 ]
Priebe, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Queen Mary,Barts & London Sch Med, Newman Ctr Mental Hlth, Unit Social & Community Psychiat, London E13 8SP, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09540260220145019
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
There are widespread calls for the implementation of outcomes management in mental health services, which involves routinely assessing individual patient outcomes to analyse the effectiveness of treatment. The emphasis in outcomes management is on aggregating outcome data on the level of groups and services and feeding the results back to commissioners, clinicians and managers to inform their decisions on service development and funding. The most important outcome criterion in mental health service research is quality of life, which is also the 'centrepiece' of outcomes management. In several countries, there are plans to implement the main component of outcomes management, i.e. routine outcome assessment, requiring clinicians to routinely assess patient outcome. However, valid data will only be collected if it is worthwhile for clinicians and patients at the level on which it is collected, i.e. the individual patient level. Concurrent assessment and feedback of outcome data to the clinician and patient so that the information can be used to inform treatment activities might make it worthwhile. A European multi-centre randomized controlled trial is currently underway to test the effect of such an intervention in the treatment of psychotic illness. Keyworkers will systematically elicit patients' views on their quality of life, treatment satisfaction and needs for additional/different care over 1 year. It is hypothesized that the intervention will improve patient outcome by prompting explicit discussion about reasons for progress-and lack of progress-in treatment as a basis for further treatment decisions. If the intervention is effective, it is hypothesized that the effect will be mediated by more appropriate treatment decisions and/or a better therapeutic relationship. Focussing on the patient's perspective in the therapeutic interaction may also facilitate patient involvement in decision-making. Finally, outcomes management is still a technical term, which could benefit from further specification and development in order to exploit its potential for improving treatment processes in mental health care.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 230
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Quality of life - As defined by schizophrenic patients and psychiatrists [J].
Angermeyer, MC ;
Holzinger, A ;
Kilian, R ;
Matschinger, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 47 (02) :34-42
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, RET WORK MENT HLTH I
[3]   Intervention research in psychosis: Issues related to the assessment of quality of life [J].
Awad, AG ;
Voruganti, LNP .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (03) :557-564
[4]  
BERTAKIS KD, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V32, P175
[5]  
BRILL PL, 1995, BEHAV HEALTHC TOM, V4, P76
[6]   Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study [J].
Britten, N ;
Stevenson, FA ;
Barry, CA ;
Barber, N ;
Bradley, CP .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7233) :484-488
[7]  
BRUGHA TS, 2001, MENTAL HLTH OUTCOME
[8]   The currency of case management: benefits and costs [J].
Burgess, P ;
Pirkis, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 12 (02) :195-199
[9]  
Department of Health, 1997, NEW NHS MOD DEP
[10]  
Drew P, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P58, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00125.x