Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: A contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China

被引:159
作者
Wang, Hong
Mullahy, John
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Global Hlth Div, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Madison, WI 53705 USA
关键词
willingness-to-pay; contingent valuation; air quality; environmental health; economic evaluation; China;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In China, 76% of all energy comes from coal consumption, which is the major cause of air pollution. One of the major barriers to developing sound policies for controlling air pollution is the lack of information related to the value of the health consequences of air pollution. We conducted a willingness-to-pay (WTP) study using contingent valuation (CV) methods in Chongqing, China to estimate the economic value of saving one statistical life through improving air quality. A sample of 500residents was chosen based on multistage sampling methods. A face-to-face household interview was conducted using a series of hypothetical, open-ended scenarios followed by bidding game questions designed to elicit the respondents' WTP for air pollution reduction. The Two-Part Model was used for estimations. The results show that 96% of respondents were able to express their WTP. Their mean annual income is $490. Their WTP to save one statistical life is $34,458. Marginal increases for saving one statistical life is $240 with I year age increase, $14,434 with 100 yuan monthly income increase, and $1590 with I year education increase. Unlike developed country, clean air may still be considered as a "luxury" good in China based on the estimation of income elasticity. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J MOD PREV MED
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTINGENT VALUATION
[3]   WORKER PREFERENCES AND MARKET COMPENSATION FOR JOB RISK [J].
BIDDLE, JE ;
ZARKIN, GA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1988, 70 (04) :660-667
[4]   Estimating general-population utilities using one binary-gamble question per respondent [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Hammitt, JK ;
Weinstein, MC ;
Hunink, MGM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) :381-390
[5]   Hypothetical surveys versus real commitments: further evidence [J].
Carlson, JL .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 7 (07) :447-450
[6]   Contingent valuation: A user's guide [J].
Carson, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1413-1418
[7]   CONTINGENT VALUATION - IS SOME NUMBER BETTER THAN NO NUMBER [J].
DIAMOND, PA ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :45-64
[8]  
Duan N., 1983, J EC BUSINESS STATIS, V1, P115, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1391852, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509330]
[9]   VALUING THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :19-43
[10]  
HARA A, 1995, REV METHODS VALUING