Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics

被引:265
作者
Bisseling, Rob W.
Hof, At L.
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Ctr Human Movement Sci, NL-9700 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Ctr Sport Movement & Hlth, NL-9700 AD Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
accelerometers; biomechanics; impact; inverse dynamics; jumping; overuse injuries;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.021
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In the standard inverse dynamic method, joint moments are assessed from ground reaction force data and position data, where segmental accelerations are calculated by numerical differentiation of position data after low-pass filtering. This method falls short in analyzing the impact phase, e.g. landing after a jump, by underestimating the contribution of the segmental accelerations to the joint moment assessment. This study tried to improve the inverse dynamics method for the assessment of knee moment by evaluating different cutoff frequencies in low-pass filtering of position data on the calculation of knee moment. Next to this, the effect of an inclusion of direct measurement of segmental acceleration using accelerometers to the inverse dynamics was evaluated. Evidence was obtained that during impact, the contribution of the ground reaction force to the sagittal knee moment was neutralized by the moments generated by very high segmental accelerations. Because the accelerometer-based method did not result in the expected improvement of the knee moment assessment during activities with high impacts, it is proposed to filter the ground reaction force with the same cutoff frequency as the calculated accelerations. When this precaution is not taken, the impact peaks in the moments can be considered as artifacts. On the basis of these findings, we recommend in the search to biomechanical explanations of chronic overuse injuries, like jumper's knee, not to consider the relation with impact peak force and impact peak moment. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2438 / 2444
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LANDING PHASE IN HEEL TOE RUNNING [J].
BOBBERT, MF ;
YEADON, MR ;
NIGG, BM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (03) :223-234
[2]   POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[3]   A PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING RIGID-BODY TRANSFORMATION PARAMETERS [J].
CHALLIS, JH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (06) :733-737
[4]   IMPULSIVE FORCES DURING WALKING AND THEIR CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
COLLINS, JJ ;
WHITTLE, MW .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1989, 4 (03) :179-187
[5]   Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters [J].
de Leva, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (09) :1223-1230
[6]   THE MEASUREMENT OF SHOCK-WAVES FOLLOWING HEEL STRIKE WHILE RUNNING [J].
DICKINSON, JA ;
COOK, SD ;
LEINHARDT, TM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1985, 18 (06) :415-422
[7]   A comparative study of impact dynamics: wobbling mass model versus rigid body models [J].
Gruber, K ;
Ruder, H ;
Denoth, J ;
Schneider, K .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 31 (05) :439-444
[8]   AN EXPLICIT EXPRESSION FOR THE MOMENT IN MULTIBODY SYSTEMS [J].
HOF, AL .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (10) :1209-1211
[9]   Classification and comparison of biomechanical response strategies for accommodating landing impact [J].
James, CR ;
Bates, BT ;
Dufek, JS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 19 (02) :106-118
[10]   COMBINING POSITION AND ACCELERATION MEASUREMENTS FOR JOINT FORCE ESTIMATION [J].
LADIN, Z ;
GE, W .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1991, 24 (12) :1173-1187