Changing plans: Dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point

被引:28
作者
Barkan, R [1 ]
Busemeyer, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212962
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
This article presents a new test of a principle of decision making called dynamic consistency. This principle was tested in an experiment in which participants were asked to make decisions about a second gamble within a sequence of two gambles. Participants were first asked to make a planned choice about the second gamble. The planned choice was made before the first gamble was played and was conditioned on the anticipated outcomes of the first gamble. After the first gamble was played, the same participants were asked to make a final choice about the second gamble, conditioned on the experienced outcome of the first gamble. The results showed that participants' final choices were frequently inconsistent with their plans, even when the anticipated and experienced outcomes were identical. These inconsistencies occurred in a systematic direction. Experiencing an anticipated gain resulted with a change toward risk aversion, and experiencing an anticipated loss resulted in a change toward risk seeking. These results are explained in terms of the effect of actual experience on the reference point used for the evaluation of the decision problem.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 554
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
BUSEMEYER JR, 1998, UNPUB DYNAMIC CONSEQ
[2]  
Clemen R., 1996, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis
[3]  
Kahneman D., 1992, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V5, P187, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960050304
[4]  
Keeny R., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
[5]   A BIAS IN THE PREDICTION OF TASTES [J].
LOEWENSTEIN, G ;
ADLER, D .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1995, 105 (431) :929-937
[6]  
MACHINA MJ, 1989, J ECON LIT, V27, P1622
[7]   The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: Focus on outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability [J].
Nygren, TE ;
Isen, AM ;
Taylor, PJ ;
Dulin, J .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 66 (01) :59-72
[8]  
Raiffa H., 1997, Decision analysis
[9]  
SARIN R, IN PRESS J RISK UNCE
[10]   THE DISJUNCTION EFFECT IN CHOICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
SHAFIR, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (05) :305-309