Painful metastases involving bone: Feasibility of percutaneous CT- and US-guided radio-frequency ablation

被引:218
作者
Callstrom, MR
Charboneau, JW
Goetz, MP
Rubin, J
Wong, GY
Sloan, JA
Novotny, PJ
Lewis, BD
Welch, TJ
Farrell, MA
Maus, TP
Lee, RA
Reading, CC
Petersen, IA
Pickett, DD
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
bone neoplasms; secondary; therapeutic radiology; computed tomography (CT); guidance; radiofrequency (RF) ablation;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2241011613
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of radio-frequency (RF) ablation for pain reduction, quality of life improvement, and analgesics use reduction in patients with skeletal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 10 months, 12 adult patients with a single painful osteolytic metastasis in whom radiation therapy or chemotherapy had failed and who reported severe pain (pain score greater than or equal to4 [scale of 0-10]) over a 24-hour period were treated with percutaneous imaging-guided RF ablation with a multitined electrode while under general anesthesia. Patient pain was measured with a Brief Pain Inventory I day after the procedure, every week for I month, and thereafter every other week (total follow-up, 6 months). Patient analgesics use was also recorded at these follow-up intervals. Follow-up contrast material-enhanced computed tomography was performed 1 week after the procedure. Complications were monitored. Analysis of the primary end point was undertaken with paired comparison procedures. RESULTS: Lesion size was 1-11 cm. Before RF ablation, mean worst pain score in a 24-hour period in 12 patients was 8.0 (range, 6-10). At 4 weeks after treatment, mean worst pain decreased to 3.1 (P = .001). Mean pain before treatment was 6.5 and decreased to 1.8 (P < .001) 4 weeks after treatment. Mean pain interference in general activity decreased from 6.6 to 2.7 (P = .002) 4 weeks after treatment, Eight of 10 patients using analgesics reported reduced use at some time after RIF ablation. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: RF ablation of painful osteolytic metastases is safe, and the relief of pain is substantial. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   PAIN AND ITS TREATMENT IN OUTPATIENTS WITH METASTATIC CANCER [J].
CLEELAND, CS ;
GONIN, R ;
HATFIELD, AK ;
EDMONSON, JH ;
BLUM, RH ;
STEWART, JA ;
PANDYA, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (09) :592-596
[2]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE WISCONSIN BRIEF PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS PAIN IN CANCER AND OTHER DISEASES [J].
DAUT, RL ;
CLEELAND, CS ;
FLANERY, RC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (02) :197-210
[3]  
DORREPAAL KL, 1989, CANCER, V63, P593, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890201)63:3<593::AID-CNCR2820630332>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-5
[5]  
Dupuy D. E., 1998, CRIT REV, V75, P161
[6]  
Dupuy DE, 1998, RADIOLOGY, V209P, P389
[7]  
Fairclough DL, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P1197, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970615)16:11<1197::AID-SIM531>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-9
[9]  
Fairclough DL, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P781, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<781::AID-SIM821>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-F