Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?

被引:275
作者
Revel, MP
Bissery, A
Bienvenu, M
Aycard, L
Lefort, C
Frija, G
机构
[1] Georges Pompidou European Univ Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, INSERM, Dept Radiol, F-75015 Paris, France
[2] Georges Pompidou European Univ Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, INSERM, Clin Invest Ctr 9201, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
lung neoplasms; CT; diagnosis; lung; nodule;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2312030167
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement of two-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) measurements of pulmonary nodules less than 2 cm in diameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers independently made three serial measurements of each of 54 pulmonary nodules measuring 3-18 mm that had been observed on standard-dose multisection CT images obtained in 24 patients who ranged in age from 36 to 81 years (mean age, 54.6 years). There were 14 women (58%), who ranged in age from 43 to 81 years (mean age, 58.9 years), and 10 men (42%), who ranged in age from 36 to 65 years (mean age, 48.5 years). The largest transverse cross-sectional diameter of each nodule was measured at picture archiving and communication system, or PACS, workstations by using high-spatial-resolution reconstructed CT images and identical window settings. Intra- and interreader agreement were determined by using methods described by Bland and Altman: the coefficient of repeatability for intrareader agreement, and methods derived from the 95% limits of agreement defined by Bland and Altman for interreader agreement. RESULTS: The repeatability coefficients were 1.70, 1.32, and 1.51 mm for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for the difference among readers were -1.73 and 1.73. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional CT measurements are not reliable in the evaluation of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 458
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   CANCER STATISTICS, 1993 [J].
BORING, CC ;
SQUIRES, TS ;
TONG, T .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1993, 43 (01) :7-26
[4]  
British Standards Institute, 1979, 5497 BS
[5]   FDG imaging of lung nodules: A phantom study comparing SPECT, camera-based PET, and dedicated PET [J].
Coleman, RE ;
Laymon, CM ;
Turkington, TG .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) :823-828
[6]   NATURAL-HISTORY OF LUNG-CANCER - REVIEW BASED ON RATES OF TUMOR-GROWTH [J].
GEDDES, DM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF THE CHEST, 1979, 73 (01) :1-17
[7]   Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error [J].
Halligan, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (890) :193-194
[8]   Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening [J].
Henschke, CI ;
McCauley, DI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Naidich, DP ;
McGuinness, G ;
Miettinen, OS ;
Libby, DM ;
Pasmantier, MW ;
Koizumi, J ;
Altorki, NK ;
Smith, JP .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) :99-105
[9]   Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-Guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: Comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules [J].
Li, HQ ;
Boiselle, PM ;
Shepard, JAO ;
TrotmanDickenson, B ;
McLoud, TC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) :105-109
[10]   Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements [J].
Rousson, V ;
Gasser, T ;
Seifert, B .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (22) :3431-3446