Activation in ventral prefrontal cortex is sensitive to genetic vulnerability for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

被引:136
作者
Durston, Sarah
Mulder, Martijn
Casey, B. J.
Ziermans, Tim
van Engeland, Herman
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Neuroimaging Lab,Rudolg Magnus Inst Neurosci, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Cornell Univ, Weoll Med Coll, Sackler Inst Dev Psychobiol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
ADHD; fMRI; genetic vulnerability; siblings; ventral PFC; endophenotype;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.020
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heritable neuropsychiatric disorder, associated with atypical Patterns of brain activation in functional imaging studies. Neuroimaging measures may serve as an intermediate phenotype in genetic studies of ADHD, as they are putatively more closely linked to gene expression than a clinical diagnosis. Methods: We used rapid, mixed-trial, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate changes in brain activation during a go no-go task in boys with ADHD, their unaffected siblings, and matched control subjects. Results. On the hardest inhibitory trials in our task, children and adolescents with ADHD bad lower accuracy than control subjects, whereas their unaffected siblings did not. Control subjects activated a network of regions, including ventral prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex, Both children and adolescents with ADHD and their unaffected siblings showed decreased activation in these areas, as well as fewer correlations between performance and activation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the magnitude of activation during successful inhibitions is sensitive to genetic vulnerability for ADHD in a number of regions, including ventral prefrontal cortex. If this can be replicated in future studies, this suggests that neuroimaging measures related to inhibitory control may be suitable as intermediate phenotypes in studies investigating gene effects in ADHD.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1070
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Achenbach T. M., 1991, Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and the TRF profiles
[2]   The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: Relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Aron, AR ;
Poldrack, RA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (11) :1285-1292
[3]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[4]   The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task [J].
Bellgrove, MA ;
Hester, R ;
Garavan, H .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (14) :1910-1916
[5]  
BIEDERMAN J, 1992, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V49, P728
[6]   Larger deficits in brain networks for response inhibition than for visual selective attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [J].
Booth, JR ;
Burman, DD ;
Meyer, JR ;
Lei, Z ;
Trommer, BL ;
Davenport, ND ;
Li, W ;
Parrish, TB ;
Gitelman, DR ;
Mesulam, MM .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (01) :94-111
[7]   Biological contributions to the presentation and understanding of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review [J].
Bradley, JDD ;
Golden, CJ .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 21 (06) :907-929
[8]  
Brett M., 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P1140, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)90010-8
[9]   The feasibility of a common stereotactic space for children and adults in fMRI studies of development [J].
Burgund, ED ;
Kang, HC ;
Kelly, JE ;
Buckner, RL ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Petersen, SE ;
Schlaggar, BL .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (01) :184-200
[10]   Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the counting stroop [J].
Bush, G ;
Frazier, JA ;
Rauch, SL ;
Seidman, LJ ;
Whalen, PJ ;
Jenike, MA ;
Rosen, BR ;
Biederman, J .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (12) :1542-1552