Analysis of phenotypic variation of sugar profile in different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies

被引:76
作者
Cantin, Celia M. [1 ]
Gogorcena, Yolanda [1 ]
Angeles Moreno, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Estac Expt Aula Dei, Dpto Pomol, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
Brix; fruit breeding; fruit quality; HPLC; sugars; FRUIT-QUALITY; GENOTYPIC VARIATION; ACID CONCENTRATIONS; PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS; CULTIVARS; DAVIDIANA; TRAITS; TASTE;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.3672
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Specific sugar contents are well known for contributing to a range of quality traits of fresh fruits such as flavour, texture and health properties. Peaches and nectarines of 205 genotypes from 14 different breeding progenies cultivated under Mediterranean conditions were evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography for their content of these sugar traits. RESULTS: A high contribution of cross to the phenotypic variance of all evaluated fruit quality traits was found. There were significant differences in mean sugar concentrations between peach and nectarine, yellow- and white-fleshed or freestone and clingstone genotypes. Pre-selected genotypes from the original breeding programme showed enhanced soluble solid content (SSC), total sugar and sucrose contents. A significant effect of year was found for SSC, sucrose and glucose contents, whereas no effect was found for fructose and sorbitol contents. Individual sugar contents correlated significantly with each other and with other fruit quality traits. CONCLUSION: A significant effect of cross, year and qualitative traits on the sugar profile of peaches and nectarines was found. Moreover, the differences shown in sugar traits between the breeding population and the pre-selected genotypes indicated the importance of sugar profile in the global quality of peaches and nectarines. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:1909 / 1917
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AOAC, 1984, OFF METH AN
[2]   An expanded genetic linkage map of Prunus based on an interspecific cross between almond and peach [J].
Bliss, FA ;
Arulsekar, S ;
Foolad, MR ;
Becerra, V ;
Gillen, AM ;
Warburton, ML ;
Dandekar, AM ;
Kocsisne, GM ;
Mydin, KK .
GENOME, 2002, 45 (03) :520-529
[3]   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE CHANGES IN SUGAR CONTENT OF PEACH GENOTYPES [PRUNUS-PERSICA (L) BATSCH] [J].
BROOKS, SJ ;
MOORE, JN ;
MURPHY, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1993, 118 (01) :97-100
[4]   VARIABILITY IN SUGARS, ACIDS, FIRMNESS, AND COLOR CHARACTERISTICS OF 12 PEACH GENOTYPES [J].
BYRNE, DH ;
NIKOLIC, AN ;
BURNS, EE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1991, 116 (06) :1004-1006
[5]  
Cantin C., 2006, ACTAS HORT, V45, P209
[6]   Evaluation of the Antioxidant Capacity, Phenolic Compounds, and Vitamin C Content of Different Peach and Nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] Breeding Progenies [J].
Cantin, Celia M. ;
Moreno, Maria A. ;
Gogorcena, Yolanda .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (11) :4586-4592
[7]  
CANTIN CM, 2009, ESTUDIO AGRONOMICA C
[8]   CHANGES IN NONVOLATILE ACIDS, SUGARS, PECTIN, AND SUGAR COMPOSITION OF PECTIN DURING PEACH (CV MONROE) MATURATION [J].
CHAPMAN, GW ;
HORVAT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1990, 38 (02) :383-387
[9]   Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes [J].
Colaric, M ;
Veberic, R ;
Stampar, F ;
Hudina, M .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2005, 85 (15) :2611-2616
[10]   Segregation of peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics [J].
Crisosto, CH ;
Crisosto, GM ;
Echeverria, G ;
Puy, J .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 39 (01) :10-18