Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy - A randomized trial

被引:76
作者
Denberg, Thomas D.
Coombes, John M.
Byers, Tim E.
Marcus, Alfred C.
Feinberg, Lawrence E.
Steiner, John F.
Ahnen, Dennis J.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Div Gen Internal Med, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-12-200612190-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Even when primary care physicians have face-to-face discussions with patients before referring them for screening colonoscopy, patient nonadherence can be substantial. Often, primary care physicians lack sufficient time to educate patients and address their potential misconceptions and fears about this procedure. Objective: To test whether an informational brochure sent to patients' home addresses after referral for screening colonoscopy would increase patient completion of the procedure. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: 2 general internal medicine practices affiliated with the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Patients: 781 consecutive patients 50 years of age or older referred by their primary care physicians for screening colonoscopy. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive usual care (control group) versus usual care plus an informational brochure (intervention group). The brochure was mailed within 10 days of referral for screening colonoscopy; it mentioned the name of the patient's primary care physician and encouraged patients to schedule a procedure. It also described colorectal cancer and polyps and the similar lifetime risks for colorectal cancer for men and women, colonoscopy and risk for perforation, the nature of bowel preparation for the procedure, and alternative screening tests. Measurements: Rates of adherence to screening colonoscopy in the 2 study groups. Results: The overall adherence rate was 11.7 percentage points (95% Cl, 5.1 to 18.4 percentage points) greater in the intervention group than in the control group (70.7% vs. 59.0%). Older patients were more adherent than younger patients. Patients with low-income insurance plans, such as Medicaid, were less adherent despite being sent a brochure. Limitations: The small number of clinical practices and minority patients may limit generalizability. In addition, it was not possible to determine the degree to which adherence was influenced by a reminder to schedule a procedure versus detailed information about colonoscopy. Conclusions: An inexpensive mailed brochure is an effective way to increase patient adherence to primary care physician referral for screening colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Effectiveness of open-access endoscopy in routine primary-care practice [J].
Charles, RJ ;
Cooper, GS ;
Wong, RCK ;
Sivak, MV ;
Chak, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) :183-186
[2]   Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy [J].
Denberg, TD ;
Melhado, TV ;
Coombes, JM ;
Beaty, BL ;
Berman, K ;
Byers, TE ;
Marcus, AC ;
Steiner, JF ;
Ahnen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (11) :989-995
[3]   Differences in clinical communication by gender [J].
Elderkin-Thompson, V ;
Waitzkin, H .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (02) :112-121
[4]   PHYSICIAN GENDER BIAS IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING - SCREENING FOR CANCER IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
FRANKS, P ;
CLANCY, CM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (03) :213-218
[5]   Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among medicare consumers [J].
Klabunde, CN ;
Schenck, AP ;
Davis, AW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 30 (04) :313-319
[6]   Comparison of racial/ethnic disparities in adult immunization and cancer screening [J].
Lees, KA ;
Wortley, PM ;
Coughlin, SS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 29 (05) :404-411
[7]   THE IMPACT OF MAILING PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL MATERIALS TO WOMEN WITH ABNORMAL MAMMOGRAMS [J].
LERMAN, C ;
ROSS, E ;
BOYCE, A ;
GORCHOV, PM ;
MCLAUGHLIN, R ;
RIMER, B ;
ENGSTROM, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (05) :729-730
[8]  
Lurie N, 1997, J GEN INTERN MED, V12, P34
[9]   Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States [J].
Meissner, HI ;
Breen, N ;
Klabunde, CN ;
Vernon, SW .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (02) :389-394
[10]   The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials [J].
Moher, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Altman, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15) :1987-1991