An approach to computing ethics

被引:53
作者
Anderson, Michael [1 ]
Anderson, Susan Leigh
Armen, Chris
机构
[1] Univ Hartford, Hartford, CT 06117 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Stamford, CT USA
[3] Amherst Coll, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/MIS.2006.64
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A team of an ethicist and computer scientists are making attempts to make ethics computable by employing an approach, M that employs machine learning to help determine the ethically correct action when different ethical duties give conflicting advice. This approach lends itself to machine implementation by giving the agent either a single principle or several principles to guide its actions, unlike other approaches that don't specify the correct action in an ethical dilemma. A good action-based ethical theory should have consistency and completeness that indicates how to act in any ethical dilemma. The approach to computing ethics is illustrated by MEDETHEX, a system that uses machine learning to resolve a biomedical ethical dilemma. The method adopted for the computation can help make a multiple prima facie duty theory and adopts John Rawl's reflective equilibrium approach to creating and refining ethical principles.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ANDERSON M, 2005, P AAAI 2005 FALL S M, P1
[2]  
ANDERSON M, 2005, P AAAI 2005 FALL S C, P9
[3]  
ANDERSON S, 1999, QUESTIONING MATTERS, P599
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS REV
[5]  
Beauchamp TL, 1979, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90063-5
[6]  
Bentham J., 1799, INTRO PRINCIPLES MOR
[7]  
BUCHANAN AE, 1989, DECIDING OTHERS ETHI, P48
[8]  
Lavrac N., 1997, INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROG
[9]  
MAPPES TA, 2001, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, P39
[10]  
MILL JS, 1974, UTILIARIANISM OTHER, pCH5