Priority scheduling policies for repair shops

被引:25
作者
Guide, VDR
Srivastava, R
Kraus, ME
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, AJ Palumbo Sch Business Adm, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
[2] USAF, Inst Technol, Grad Sch Logist & Acquisit Management, Dept Grad Logist Management, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[3] USAF, Inst Technol, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Operat Sci, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/002075400189220
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The use of repair as an alternative to the replacement of products is a growing trend in many industries, especially those employing expensive assets. Repair shop environments are characterized by a greater degree of uncertainty than traditional job or assembly shop environments, and this introduces unique managerial complications. In this study, scheduling policies are examined in the repair shop environment where no end-item spares are available or where the spares stocking decision is deferred until the minimum obtainable flowtimes for end-items are established. Previous studies of scheduling policies have focused on the case where spares are allowed and have not considered all of the sources of variation in the repair environment. The model developed in this study incorporates these sources of uncertainty, as well as other factors likely to influence repair shop performance. The results show that the variability in repair shops is sufficiently higher than in traditional job or assembly shops to warrant different scheduling policies than those previously reported. The choice of scheduling policy to provide minimum flowtimes and RMS tardiness is operating;environment specific, and clear guidelines are presented for the manager in a repair shop environment.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 950
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRODUCTION OPERATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Planning of Experiments
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, OPTIMAL INVENTORY MO
[4]   BATCHING POLICIES FOR A REPAIR SHOP WITH LIMITED SPARES AND FINITE-CAPACITY [J].
CHUA, RCH ;
SCUDDER, GD ;
HILL, AV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 66 (01) :135-147
[5]  
DAREL EM, 1982, J MANUF SYST, V1, P77
[6]  
Duncan A., 1986, Quality control and industrial statistics, V5th
[7]   Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review [J].
Fleischmann, M ;
BloemhofRuwaard, JM ;
Dekker, R ;
vanderLaan, E ;
vanNunen, JAEE ;
VanWassenhove, LN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (01) :1-17
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF PRODUCT STRUCTURE AND SEQUENCING RULE ON ASSEMBLY SHOP PERFORMANCE [J].
FRY, TD ;
OLIFF, MD ;
MINOR, ED ;
LEONG, GK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (04) :671-686
[9]  
Goodwin J. S., 1982, Decision Sciences, V13, P585, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb01184.x
[10]   EVALUATING SCHEDULING POLICIES IN A MULTILEVEL ASSEMBLY SYSTEM [J].
GOODWIN, JS ;
WEEKS, JK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :247-257