Current distribution and potential extent of the most invasive alien plant species on La Reunion (Indian Ocean, Mascarene islands)

被引:65
作者
Baret, Stephane
Rouget, Mathieu
Richardson, David M.
Lavergne, Christophe
Egoh, Benis
Dupont, Joel
Strasberg, Dominique
机构
[1] Univ Reunion, CIRAD UMR C53, St Pierre 97410, Reunion, France
[2] S African Natl Biodivers Inst, Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, Claremont, CA USA
[3] Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, Leslie Hill Inst Plant Conservat, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[4] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[5] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Biocomplex Res Grp, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
关键词
bioclimatic modelling; biodiversity hotspot; biological invasion; conservation planning; predictive model; spatial distribution;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01636.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
La R union Island has the largest area of intact vegetation of the islands in the Mascarene archipelago. Biological invasions are the primary threat to biodiversity in the intact habitats of the island (those not already transformed by agriculture and urbanization). Our study aimed to identify areas to prioritize in managing invasive alien plants for biodiversity conservation. We used extensive surveys of 238 distinct untransformed areas on La Reunion to define the current distribution patterns of all invasive species. Using expert knowledge, we compiled maps of the current distribution of the 46 most widespread/important invasive plants at the habitat scale (identified according to vegetation structure). Data from 440 botanical releves for the 20 most threatening invasive alien plant species across the island and climatic envelope models were used to derive climatic suitability surfaces; these were used to map potential distributions for these species. More than 10 species invade 16.7% of the remaining habitat. Five habitat types are invaded by 25 or more species, and eight have fewer than 10 invasive alien plant species. Cluster analysis based on presence/absence of species in the 18 habitat types produced eight groups of species that invade particular habitats. Potential distribution models show that some species have invaded large parts of their potential range (e.g. Fuchsia magellanica, Furcraea foetida, Hiptage benghalensis), whereas others have the potential to increase their range substantially (e.g. Clidemia hirta, Strobilanthes hamiltonianus, Ulex europaeus). Management implications are identified for both groups. Three broad groups of habitats were identified: (i) intact habitats with a low level of invasion (e.g. subalpine shrubland); (ii) moderately invaded habitats with varying levels of intactness (ranging from windward submountain rainforest to the Acacia heterophylla forest); and (iii) habitats with little remaining intact area and high levels of invasion (e.g. lowland rainforest). Different management interventions are appropriate for these three groups.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 758
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Monogr. Sys. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard.
[2]   Altitudinal variation in fertility and vegetative growth in the invasive plant Rubus alceifolius Poiret (Rosaceae), on Reunion island. [J].
Baret, S ;
Maurice, S ;
Le Bourgeois, T ;
Strasberg, D .
PLANT ECOLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :265-273
[3]  
BARET S, 2002, THESIS U LAREUNION F
[4]  
Cadet T., 1977, THESIS U AIX MARSEIL
[5]  
CPHEN, 1960, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V20, P37
[6]   The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds [J].
Daehler, CC .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 84 (02) :167-180
[7]  
*DIREN, 2001, ATL ENV DIREN REUN
[8]  
DUPONT J, 1985, FICHES INVENTAIRE ZO
[9]   Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance [J].
Farber, O ;
Kadmon, R .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 160 (1-2) :115-130
[10]   A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models [J].
Fielding, AH ;
Bell, JF .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 24 (01) :38-49