Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Effects on diaphragmatic and respiratory function

被引:96
作者
Borgeat, A [1 ]
Perschak, H [1 ]
Bird, P [1 ]
Hodler, J [1 ]
Gerber, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Orthoped Clin Balgrist, Dept Anesthesiol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
local anesthetics; opioids; peak expiratory flow rate; vital capacity;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200001000-00020
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The authors compared the effects of patient-controlled interscalene analgesia (PCIA) with ropivacaine 0.2% and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIVA) with opioids on hemidiaphragmatic excursion and respiratory function after major shoulder surgery. Methods: Thirty-five patients scheduled for elective major shoulder surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either PCM or PCIVA. All patients received an interscalene block before surgery. In the PCIA group, a catheter was introduced between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. Six hours after the initial block, patients received for 48 h either a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine through the interscalene catheter at a rate of 5 ml/h plus a bolus dose of 3 or 4 mi with a lockout time of 20 min (PCIA group) or a continuous intravenous infusion of nicomorphine at a rate or 0.5 mg/h plus a bolus dose of 2 or 3 mg with a lockout time of 20 min (PCIVA group). Hemidiaphragmatic excursion and respiratory function were assessed with the patient in a 45 degrees semirecumbent position the day before the operation and 20 min (in the operating room), 24 h, and 48 h after the initial block by means of ultrasonography and spirometry, respectively. Pain relief was regularly assessed, side effects were noted, and patient satisfaction was rated 6 h after the end of the study. Results: Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was similar in the two groups 20 min after interscalene block. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was increased in the PCIA group on the nonoperated side 24 and 48 h after the interscalene block(P < 0.05). Pulmonary function was similar in the two groups at each time, Pain was better controlled in the PCIA group at 12 and 24 h (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting were 5.5% results 60% for the PCIA and PCNA groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was greater in the PCIA group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of PCIA or PCIVA techniques to provide analgesia after major shoulder surgery is associated with similar effects on respiratory function, In the PCIA group, hemidiaphragmatic excursion showed a significantly greater amplitude 24 and 48 h after the initial block on the nonoperated side, The PCIA technique provided better pain control, a lower incidence of side effects, and a higher degree of patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Respiratory effects of low-dose bupivacaine interscalene block [J].
Al-Kaisy, AA ;
Chan, VWS ;
Perlas, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :217-220
[2]   A new technique of continuous interscalene nerve block [J].
Boezaart, AP ;
de Beer, JF ;
du Toit, C ;
van Rooyen, K .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (03) :275-281
[3]   Patient-controlled analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia [J].
Borgeat, A ;
Schappi, B ;
Biasca, N ;
Gerber, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1343-1347
[4]   Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery: PCIA vs PCA [J].
Borgeat, A ;
Tewes, E ;
Biasca, N ;
Gerber, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 81 (04) :603-605
[5]   INTERSCALENE BLOCK FOR SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY - COMPARISON WITH GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
BROWN, AR ;
WEISS, R ;
GREENBERG, C ;
FLATOW, EL ;
BIGLIANI, LU .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (03) :295-300
[6]   Pulmonary function changes after interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia with 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine: A double-blinded comparison with 2% mepivacaine [J].
Casati, A ;
Fanelli, G ;
Cedrati, V ;
Berti, M ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (03) :587-592
[7]  
DHUNER K G, 1955, Acta Chir Scand, V109, P53
[8]   THE EFFECT OF THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON RESPIRATORY-FUNCTION AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
HENDOLIN, H ;
LAHTINEN, J ;
LANSIMIES, E ;
TUPPURAINEN, T ;
PARTANEN, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 31 (07) :645-651
[9]   TECHNICAL REPORT - QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DIAPHRAGMATIC MOVEMENT - A REPRODUCIBLE METHOD USING ULTRASOUND [J].
HOUSTON, JG ;
MORRIS, AD ;
HOWIE, CA ;
REID, JL ;
MCMILLAN, N .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1992, 46 (06) :405-407
[10]   RESPIRATORY MUSCLE COMPENSATION FOR UNILATERAL OR BILATERAL HEMIDIAPHRAGM PARALYSIS IN AWAKE CANINES [J].
KATAGIRI, M ;
YOUNG, RN ;
PLATT, RS ;
KIESER, TM ;
EASTON, PA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 77 (04) :1972-1982