Gene expression profiles distinguish the carcinogenic effects of aristolochic acid in target (kidney) and non-target (liver) tissues in rats

被引:36
作者
Chen, Tao [1 ]
Guo, Lei
Zhang, Lu
Shi, Leming
Fang, Hong
Sun, Yongming
Fuscoe, James C.
Mei, Nan
机构
[1] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Genet & Reprod Toxicol, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Syst Toxicol, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[3] Appl Biosyst Inc, Mol Biol SDS Arrays Grp, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
[4] ZTech Corp, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[5] Solexa Inc, Hayward, CA 94545 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-7-S2-S20
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Aristolochic acid (AA) is the active component of herbal drugs derived from Aristolochia species that have been used for medicinal purposes since antiquity. AA, however, induced nephropathy and urothelial cancer in people and malignant tumors in the kidney and urinary tract of rodents. Although AA is bioactivated in both kidney and liver, it only induces tumors in kidney. To evaluate whether microarray analysis can be used for distinguishing the tissue-specific carcinogenicity of AA, we examined gene expression profiles in kidney and liver of rats treated with carcinogenic doses of AA. Results: Microarray analysis was performed using the Rat Genome Survey Microarray and data analysis was carried out within ArrayTrack software. Principal components analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis of the expression profiles showed that samples were grouped together according to the tissues and treatments. The gene expression profiles were significantly altered by AA treatment in both kidney and liver (p < 0.01; fold change > 1.5). Functional analysis with Ingenuity Pathways Analysis showed that there were many more significantly altered genes involved in cancer-related pathways in kidney than in liver. Also, analysis with Gene Ontology for Functional Analysis (GOFFA) software indicated that the biological processes related to defense response, apoptosis and immune response were significantly altered by AA exposure in kidney, but not in liver. Conclusion: Our results suggest that microarray analysis is a useful tool for detecting AA exposure; that analysis of the gene expression profiles can define the differential responses to toxicity and carcinogenicity of AA from kidney and liver; and that significant alteration of genes associated with defense response, apoptosis and immune response in kidney, but not in liver, may be responsible for the tissue-specific toxicity and carcinogenicity of AA.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, IARC MON EV CARC RIS
  • [2] Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer hazard in herbal remedies: a review
    Arlt, VM
    Stiborova, M
    Schmeiser, HH
    [J]. MUTAGENESIS, 2002, 17 (04) : 265 - 277
  • [3] Metabonomic study of aristolochic acid-induced nephrotoxicity in rats
    Chen, MJ
    Su, MM
    Zhao, LP
    Jiang, J
    Liu, P
    Cheng, JY
    Lai, YJ
    Liu, YM
    Jia, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2006, 5 (04) : 995 - 1002
  • [4] CHINESE HERBS NEPHROPATHY - A CLUE TO BALKAN ENDEMIC NEPHROPATHY
    COSYNS, JP
    JADOUL, M
    SQUIFFLET, JP
    DEPLAEN, JF
    FERLUGA, D
    DESTRIHOU, CV
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 45 (06) : 1680 - 1688
  • [5] PATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF A NEWLY DESCRIBED NEPHROPATHY RELATED TO THE PROLONGED USE OF CHINESE HERBS
    DEPIERREUX, M
    VANDAMME, B
    HOUTE, KV
    VANHERWEGHEM, JL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 24 (02) : 172 - 180
  • [6] MPP plus induced SH-SY5Y apoptosis is potentiated by cyclosporin A and inhibited by aristolochic acid
    Fall, CP
    Bennett, JP
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 811 (1-2) : 143 - 146
  • [7] Fernando R C, 1993, IARC Sci Publ, P167
  • [8] Gao RT, 2000, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V113, P418
  • [9] Aristolochic acid, an herbal carcinogen, sold on the Web after FDA alert
    Gold, LS
    Slone, TH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (16) : 1576 - 1577
  • [10] GOLD LS, 1997, HDB CARCINOGENIC POT