Blind Docking of 260 Protein-Ligand Complexes with EADock 2.0

被引:46
作者
Grosdidier, Aurelien [1 ]
Zoete, Vincent [1 ]
Michielin, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] SIB, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
small ligand docking; evolutionary algorithms; rational drug design; EADock; blind docking; MOLECULAR-FORCE FIELD; BINDING SITES; MMFF94; ENERGY; IDENTIFICATION; GEOMETRIES; DYNAMICS; GAPS;
D O I
10.1002/jcc.21202
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Molecular docking softwares are one of the important tools of modern drug development pipelines. The promising achievements of file last 10 years emphasize the need for further improvement. as reflected by several recent publications (Leach et al., J Med Chem 2006, 49, 585 1; Warren et al., I Med Chem 2006, 49, 5912). Our initial approach, EADock, showed a good performance in reproducing the experimental binding modes for a set of 37 different ligand-protein complexes (Grosdidier et al., Proteins 2007, 67, 1010). This article presents recent improvements regarding the scoring and sampling aspects over the initial implementation, as well as a new seeding procedure based oil the detection of cavities, opening the door to blind docking with EADock. These enhancements were validated on 260 complexes taken from the high quality Ligand Protein Database [LPDB, (Roche et al., J Med Chem 2001 44, 3592)]. Two issues were identified: first, the quality Of file initial Structures cannot be assumed and a manual inspection and/or a search in the literature are likely to be required to achieve file best performance. Second the description of interactions involving metal ions still has to be improved. Nonetheless, a remarkable Success rate of 65% was achieved for a large scale blind docking assay, when considering only the top ranked binding mode and a success threshold of 2 angstrom RMSD to the crystal Structure. When looking at the five-top ranked binding modes, the success rate increases up to 76%. In a standard local docking assay, success rates of 75 and 83% were obtained, considering only the top ranked binding mode, or the live top binding modes, respectively. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 30: 2021-2030, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2030
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes [J].
An, JH ;
Totrov, M ;
Abagyan, R .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2005, 4 (06) :752-761
[2]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[3]   Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult [J].
Cole, JC ;
Murray, CW ;
Nissink, JWM ;
Taylor, RD ;
Taylor, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (03) :325-332
[4]   Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions [J].
Ferrara, P ;
Gohlke, H ;
Price, DJ ;
Klebe, G ;
Brooks, CL .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (12) :3032-3047
[6]   A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures [J].
Glaser, F ;
Morris, RJ ;
Najmanovich, RJ ;
Laskowski, RA ;
Thornton, JM .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 62 (02) :479-488
[7]   EADock: Docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization [J].
Grosdidier, Aurelien ;
Zoete, Vincent ;
Michielin, Olivier .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 67 (04) :1010-1025
[8]  
Halgren TA, 1996, J COMPUT CHEM, V17, P520, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<520::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-W
[10]  
Halgren TA, 1996, J COMPUT CHEM, V17, P490, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<616::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO