Antenatal care implications of population-based trends in Down syndrome birth rates by rurality and antenatal care provider, Queensland, 1990-2004

被引:19
作者
Coory, Michael D. [1 ]
Roselli, Timothy
Carroll, Heidi J.
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Hlth, Hlth Informat Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00878.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess whether the rates of Down syndrome births in Queensland vary according to rurality (ie, whether the mother lives in a rural or urban area) and type of antenatal care provider, and to consider any implications for antenatal care. Design and setting: Population-based study of Down syndrome births in Queensland between 1990 and 2004, stratified by rurality and type of antenatal care provider (private obstetrician, public hospital or shared care). Results: Since 2000, there has been a large fall in maternal-age-adjusted rates of Down syndrome births among mothers living in urban areas (-14.3% per year; 95% CI, -22.7%, -5.0%) and among mothers receiving their antenatal care from private obstetricians (-27.5% per year; 95% CI, -37.6%, -15.8%). Similar decreases have not occurred among mothers living in rural areas (0.0%; 95% CI, -11.7%, 13.1%) or among mothers receiving antenatal care from public hospitals (+2.9%, 95% CI, -10.3%, 17.9%). Conclusion: Possible reasons for the observed trends include unequal access to antenatal screening; confusion about screening guidelines and protocols; late presentation for antenatal care; and differences in attitudes to screening and termination of pregnancy among expectant parents, such that they may choose not to have screening or not to act on a positive screening test result.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 234
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2004, ACOG ISS POS 1 TRIM
[2]   An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years [J].
Biggio, JR ;
Morris, TC ;
Owen, J ;
Stringer, JSA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (03) :721-729
[3]   Gestational age-based performance of Down syndrome screening markers: Results from the faster trial [J].
Canick, JA ;
Wald, NJ ;
Malone, FD ;
Porter, TF ;
Nyberg, DA ;
Comstock, CH ;
Saade, G ;
Eddleman, K ;
Klugman, S ;
Dugoff, L ;
Craigo, SD ;
Timor, IE ;
Carr, SR ;
Wolfe, HM ;
Sullivan, L ;
Lambert-Messerlian, G ;
Rudnicka, A ;
Hackshaw, A ;
D'Alton, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) :S116-S116
[4]   First trimester Down syndrome screening: Public health implications [J].
Fuchs, KM ;
Peipert, JF .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2005, 29 (04) :267-271
[5]   Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas [J].
Getz, L ;
Kirkengen, AL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (10) :2045-2057
[6]   Community-based screening for Down's Syndrome in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry [J].
Hadlow, NC ;
Hewitt, BG ;
Dickinson, JE ;
Jacoby, P ;
Bower, C .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (11) :1561-1564
[7]  
*HLTH INF CTR, 2005, MAN QUEENSL PER DAT
[8]   First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome [J].
Malone, FD ;
Canick, JA ;
Ball, RH ;
Nyberg, DA ;
Comstock, CH ;
Bukowski, R ;
Berkowitz, RL ;
Gross, SJ ;
Dugoff, L ;
Craigo, SD ;
Timor-Tritsch, IE ;
Carr, SR ;
Wolfe, HM ;
Dukes, K ;
Bianchi, DW ;
Rudnicka, AR ;
Hackshaw, AK ;
Lambert-Messerlian, G ;
Wald, NJ ;
D'Alton, ME .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (19) :2001-2011
[9]  
*MED SERV ADV COMM, 2003, NUCH TRANSL MEAS 1 T
[10]   Women's knowledge of and attitudes to first and second trimester screening for Down's syndrome [J].
Mulvey, S ;
Wallace, EM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (10) :1302-1305