Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy

被引:103
作者
Huenemohr, Nora [1 ]
Paganetti, Harald [2 ,3 ]
Greilich, Steffen [1 ]
Jaekel, Oliver [1 ,4 ]
Seco, Joao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Radiat Therapy, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
dual energy CT; stoichiometric calibration; Monte Carlo; composition; WEPL; range uncertainty; EFFECTIVE ATOMIC-NUMBER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; PROTON; BRACHYTHERAPY; SINGLE; SEGMENTATION; SIMULATION; CARBON;
D O I
10.1118/1.4875976
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: The authors describe a novel method of predicting mass density and elemental mass fractions of tissues from dual energy CT (DECT) data for Monte Carlo (MC) based dose planning. Methods: The relative electron density rho(e) and effective atomic number Z(eff) are calculated for 71 tabulated tissue compositions. For MC simulations, the mass density is derived via one linear fit in the rho(e) that covers the entire range of tissue compositions (except lung tissue). Elemental mass fractions are predicted from the rho(e) and the Z(eff) in combination. Since particle therapy dose planning and verification is especially sensitive to accurate material assignment, differences to the ground truth are further analyzed for mass density, I-value predictions, and stopping power ratios (SPR) for ions. Dose studies with monoenergetic proton and carbon ions in 12 tissues which showed the largest differences of single energy CT (SECT) to DECT are presented with respect to range uncertainties. The standard approach (SECT) and the new DECT approach are compared to reference Bragg peak positions. Results: Mean deviations to ground truth in mass density predictions could be reduced for soft tissue from (0.5 +/- 0.6)% (SECT) to (0.2 +/- 0.2)% with the DECT method. Maximum SPR deviations could be reduced significantly for soft tissue from 3.1% (SECT) to 0.7% (DECT) and for bone tissue from 0.8% to 0.1%. Mean I-value deviations could be reduced for soft tissue from (1.1 +/- 1.4%, SECT) to (0.4 +/- 0.3%) with the presented method. Predictions of elemental composition were improved for every element. Mean and maximum deviations from ground truth of all elemental mass fractions could be reduced by at least a half with DECT compared to SECT (except soft tissue hydrogen and nitrogen where the reduction was slightly smaller). The carbon and oxygen mass fraction predictions profit especially from the DECT information. Dose studies showed that most of the 12 selected tissues would profit significantly (up to 2.2%) from DECT material decomposition with no noise present. The rho(e) associated with an absolute noise of +/- 0.01 and Z(eff) associated with an absolute noise of +/- 0.2 resulted in +/- 10% standard variation in the carbon and oxygen mass fraction prediction. Conclusions: Accurate stopping power prediction is mainly determined by the correct mass density prediction. Theoretical improvements in range predictions with DECT data in the order of 0.1%-2.1% were observed. Further work is needed to quantify the potential improvements from DECT compared to SECT in measured image data associated with artifacts and noise. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
On the clinical spatial resolution achievable with protons and heavier charged particle radiotherapy beams [J].
Andreo, Pedro .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (11) :N205-N215
[2]
[Anonymous], 1993, 49 ICRU
[3]
Bazalova M., 2009, 48 M PART THER COOP
[4]
Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations [J].
Bazalova, Magdalena ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (09) :2439-2456
[5]
Tissue Inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo Treatment Planning for Proton Therapy [J].
Beaulieu, L. ;
Bazalova, M. ;
Furstoss, C. ;
Verhaegen, F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2616-+
[6]
Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation [J].
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Davis, Stephen D. ;
Mourtada, Firas ;
Rivard, Mark J. ;
Thomson, Rowan M. ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Wareing, Todd A. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) :6208-6236
[7]
The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions [J].
Espana, Samuel ;
Paganetti, Harald .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (24) :7557-7571
[8]
First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system (vol 16, pg 256, 2006) [J].
Flohr, TG ;
McCollough, CH ;
Bruder, H ;
Petersilka, M ;
Gruber, K ;
Süss, C ;
Grasruck, M ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Krauss, B ;
Raupach, R ;
Primak, AN ;
Küttner, A ;
Achenbach, S ;
Becker, C ;
Kopp, A ;
Ohnesorge, BM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) :1405-1405
[9]
Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates [J].
Huenemohr, Nora ;
Krauss, Bernhard ;
Tremmel, Christoph ;
Ackermann, Benjamin ;
Jaekel, Oliver ;
Greilich, Steffen .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (01) :83-96
[10]
Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography [J].
Huenemohr, Nora ;
Krauss, Bernhard ;
Dinkel, Julien ;
Gillmann, Clarissa ;
Ackermann, Benjamin ;
Jaekel, Oliver ;
Greilich, Steffen .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2013, 23 (04) :300-313