A post-processing/region of interest (ROI) method for discriminating patterns of activity in statistical maps of fMRI data

被引:9
作者
McKeown, MJ
Hanlon, CA
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia Hosp, Dept Med Neurol, Pacific Parkinsons Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Neurobiol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
functional MRI; regions of interest; discriminant analysis; resampling methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.021
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To combine functional neuroimaging studies across subjects, anatomical and functional data are typically either transformed to a common space or averaged across regions of interest (ROIs). However, if there are (I) anatomical variations within the subject pool (as in clinical or aging populations). (2) non-Gaussian distributions of task-related activity within a typical ROI or, (3) more ROIs than subjects, neither spatial transformation of the data to a common space nor averaging across all subjects' ROls is suitable for standard discriminant analysis. To solve these problems. we describe a post-processing method that uses voxel-based statistics representing task-related activity (pooled within ROIs) to establish combinations of ROIs that maximally differentiate tasks across all subjects. The method involves randomized resampling from multiple ROIs within each subject. multivariate, linear discriminant analysis across all subjects and validation with bootstrapping techniques. When applied to experimental data from healthy subjects performing two motor tasks, the method detected some brain regions, including the supplementary motor area (SMA). that participated in a distributed network differentially active between tasks. However there was not a significant difference in SMA activity when this region was examined in isolation. We suggest this method is a practical means to combine voxel-based statistics within anatomically defined ROIs across subjects. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JACKNIFE BOOTSTRAP O
[2]   Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis [J].
Baumgartner, R ;
Ryner, L ;
Richter, W ;
Summers, R ;
Jarmasz, M ;
Somorjai, R .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (01) :89-94
[3]   EEG gamma-band phase synchronization between posterior and frontal cortex during mental rotation in humans [J].
Bhattacharya, J ;
Petsche, H ;
Feldmann, U ;
Rescher, B .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 311 (01) :29-32
[4]   Quantifying and comparing region-of-interest activation patterns in functional brain MR imaging: Methodology considerations [J].
Constable, RT ;
Skudlarski, P ;
Mencl, E ;
Pugh, KR ;
Fulbright, RK ;
Lacadie, C ;
Shaywitz, SE ;
Shaywitz, BA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 16 (03) :289-300
[5]   The preparation and execution of self-initiated and externally-triggered movement: A study of event-related fMRI [J].
Cunnington, R ;
Windischberger, C ;
Deecke, L ;
Moser, E .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (02) :373-385
[6]  
DAMASIO H, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN ANATOMY
[7]   Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI:: Effect of movement type and rate [J].
Deiber, MP ;
Honda, M ;
Ibañez, V ;
Sadato, N ;
Hallett, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 81 (06) :3065-3077
[8]  
FLURRY, 1997, 1 COURSE MULTIVARITA, P190
[9]   Spatial registration and normalization of images [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Ashburner, J ;
Frith, CD ;
Poline, JB ;
Heather, JD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :165-189
[10]  
Friston KJ, 1996, STAT PARAMETRIC MAPP, P363