An Integrated Analysis of Olanzapine/Fluoxetine Combination in Clinical Trials of Treatment-Resistant Depression

被引:55
作者
Trivedi, Madhukar H. [1 ]
Thase, Michael E. [2 ]
Osuntokun, Olawale [3 ]
Henley, David B. [3 ]
Case, Michael [3 ]
Watson, Susan B. [3 ]
Campbell, Giedra M. [3 ]
Corya, Sara A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Western Psychiat Inst & Clin, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; FAILED MEDICATION TREATMENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAJOR DEPRESSION; AUGMENTATION; VENLAFAXINE; DISORDER; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; OLANZAPINE; MIRTAZAPINE;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.08m04064
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC) versus olanzapine or fluoxetine monotherapy across all clinical trials of treatment-resistant depression sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Method: Efficacy and safety data from 1146 patients with a history of nonresponse during the current depressive episode who subsequently exhibited nonresponse during a 6- to 8-week antidepressant open-label lead-in phase and were randomly assigned to OFC (N = 462), fluoxetine (N = 342), or olanzapine (N = 342) for double-blind treatment were analyzed. All patients had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder as defined by DSM-III or DSM-IV criteria. The dates in which the trials were conducted ranged from May 1997 to July 2005. Results: After 8 weeks, OFC patients demonstrated significantly greater Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale improvement (mean change = -13.0) than fluoxetine (-8.6, p < .001) or olanzapine (-8.2, p < .001) patients, via a mixed-effects model repeated-measures analysis. Remission rates were 25.5% for OFC, 17.3% (p = .006) for fluoxetine, and 14.0% (p < .001) for olanzapine. Adverse events in >= 10% of OFC patients were weight gain, increased appetite, dry mouth, somnolence, fatigue, headache, and peripheral edema. Random glucose mean change (mg/dL) was +7.92 for the OFC group, +1.62 for the fluoxetine group (p = .020), and +9.91 for the olanzapine group (p = .485). Random cholesterol mean change (mg/dL) was +12.4 for OFC, +2.3 for fluoxetine (p < .001), and +3.1 for olanzapine (p < .001); incidence of treatment-emergent increase from normal to high cholesterol (baseline < 200 mg/dL and >= 240 subsequently) was significantly higher for the OFC group (10.2%) than for the fluoxetine group (3.1%, p = .017) but not the olanzapine group (8.0%, p = .569). Mean weight change (kg) was +4.42 for OFC, -0.15 for fluoxetine (p < .001), and +4.63 for olanzapine (p = .381), with 40.4% of OFC patients gaining >= 7% body weight (vs. olanzapine: 42.9%, p = .515; fluoxetine: 2.3%, p < .001). Conclusion: Results of this analysis showed that OFC-treated patients experienced significantly improved depressive symptoms compared with olanzapine- or fluoxetine-treated patients following failure of 2 or more antidepressants within the current depressive episode. Safety results for OFC were generally consistent with those for its component monotherapies. The total cholesterol increase associated with OFC was more pronounced than with olanzapine alone.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 396
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2005, DIABETES CARE, V28, pS37
[2]  
[Anonymous], NOT GUID CLIN INV ME
[3]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[4]   Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) [J].
Cleeman, JI ;
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, DR ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19) :2486-2497
[5]   A randomized, double-blind comparison of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination, olanzapine, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine in treatment-resistant depression [J].
Corya, Sara A. ;
Williamson, Doug ;
Sanger, Todd M. ;
Briggs, Susan D. ;
Case, Michael ;
Tollefson, Gary .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2006, 23 (06) :364-372
[6]   Onset of antidepressant effect of olanzapine and olanzapine/fluoxetine combination in bipolar depression [J].
Dube, Sanjay ;
Tollefson, Gary D. ;
Thase, Michael E. ;
Briggs, Susan D. ;
Van Campen, Luann E. ;
Case, Michael ;
Tohen, Mauricio .
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2007, 9 (06) :618-627
[7]   Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression [J].
Fava, M ;
Davidson, KG .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 19 (02) :179-&
[8]   Current status of augmentation and combination treatments for major depressive disorder: A literature review and a proposal for a novel approach to improve practice [J].
Fava, M ;
Rush, AJ .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2006, 75 (03) :139-153
[9]   A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: A STAR*D report [J].
Fava, Maurizio ;
Rush, A. John ;
Wisniewski, Stephen R. ;
Nierenberg, Andrew A. ;
Alpert, Jonathan E. ;
McGrath, Patrick J. ;
Thase, Michael E. ;
Warden, Diane ;
Biggs, Melanie ;
Luther, James F. ;
Niederehe, George ;
Ritz, Louise ;
Trivedi, Madhukar H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (07) :1161-1172
[10]  
[Gay W. Health P.R.B.N.I.o.M. Health P.R.B.N.I.o.M.], 1976, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Revised, US Dept Health, Education, and Welfare publication (ADM), P534