Diagnostic usefulness and duration of the inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: Findings in patients extensively investigated before the monitoring

被引:58
作者
Alving, Jorgen [1 ]
Beniczky, Sandor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Danish Epilepsy Ctr, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, DK-4293 Dianalund, Denmark
[2] Univ Szeged, Dept Neurol, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
来源
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY | 2009年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
Inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring; Diagnostic usefulness; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2009.04.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM) is an important diagnostic tool for patients with seizures and other paroxysmal behavioural events. The main referral categories are diagnosis (epileptic versus non-epileptic disorder), seizure classification and presurgical evaluation. The diagnostic usefulness of the LTM varies considerably (19-75%) depending on how this was defined and on the selection of the patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic usefulness and the necessary duration of the LTM for the referral groups, in patients extensively investigated before the monitoring. An LTM was considered diagnostically useful when it provided previously not reported, clinically relevant information on the paroxysmal event. For the presurgical group, reaching a decision concerning surgery was an additional requirement. We reviewed data from 234 consecutive LTM-sessions (221 patients) over a 2-year period. In 44% of the cases the LTM was diagnostically useful. There were no significant differences concerning diagnostic usefulness among the main referral groups: diagnostic (41%), classification (41%) and presurgical (55%). Diagnostic usefulness did not differ among the age groups either. The duration of the successful LTM-sessions was significantly longer in the presurgical group (mean: 3.5 days) than in the diagnostic and classification groups (2.4 and 2.3 days, respectively). We conclude that LTM is a valuable diagnostic tool even in patients extensively investigated before the monitoring, and is equally effective in the referral and age groups. However, patients referred for presurgical evaluation need considerably longer LTM, and this should be taken into account when planning the resources and calculating the costs. (C) 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 473
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Video-EEG telemetry can be a crucial tool for neurologists experienced in epilepsy when diagnosing seizure disorders [J].
Alsaadi, TM ;
Thieman, C ;
Shatzel, A ;
Farias, S .
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2004, 13 (01) :32-34
[2]  
ALVING J, 1996, EPILEPSIA S4, V37, P11
[3]   Outcome of prolonged video-EEG monitoring at a typical referral epilepsy center [J].
Benbadis, SR ;
O'Neill, E ;
Tatum, WO ;
Heriaud, L .
EPILEPSIA, 2004, 45 (09) :1150-1153
[4]   TELEMETRIC EEG AND VIDEO MONITORING IN EPILEPSY [J].
BINNIE, CD ;
ROWAN, AJ ;
OVERWEG, J ;
MEINARDI, H ;
WISMAN, T ;
KAMP, A ;
DASILVA, FL .
NEUROLOGY, 1981, 31 (03) :298-303
[5]  
Boon P, 1999, ACTA NEUROL BELG, V99, P247
[6]   Video-EEG monitoring in adults [J].
Cascino, GD .
EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 :80-93
[7]   Seizure identification by clinical description in temporal lobe epilepsy - How accurate are we? [J].
Deacon, C ;
Wiebe, S ;
Blume, WT ;
McLachlan, RS ;
Young, GB ;
Matijevic, S .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 61 (12) :1686-1689
[8]   Evaluating the utility of inpatient video-EEG monitoring [J].
Ghougassian, DF ;
d'Souza, W ;
Cook, MJ ;
O'Brien, LJ .
EPILEPSIA, 2004, 45 (08) :928-932
[9]  
Hansen CP, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P270
[10]  
Hui Andrew C. F., 2007, Hong Kong Medical Journal, V13, P228