Effect of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation on diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine coverage: an independent assessment

被引:57
作者
Lu, Chunling
Michaud, Catherine M.
Gakidou, Emmanuela
Khan, Kashif
Murray, Christopher J. L.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Initiat Global Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Inst Quantitat Social Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69337-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) was created in 1999 to enable even the poorest countries to provide vaccines to all children. We aimed to assess the effect of GAVI on combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine (DTP3) coverage. Methods We examined the relation between DTP3 coverage for GAVI recipient countries from 1995 to 2004 and immunisation services support (ISS) and non-ISS expenditure per surviving child, controlling for income per head and local political governance variables. We analysed DTP3 coverage reported by governments and estimated by WHO/UNICEF. We also investigated the effect of GAVI on country reporting behaviour. Results In countries with DTP3 coverage of 65% or less at baseline, IS S spending per surviving child had a significant positive effect on DTP3 coverage (p=0.0005). This effect was not present in countries with DTP3 coverage of 65-80% or 80% or more at baseline. If IS S expenditure only is assessed, the estimated cost per additional child immunised in countries with baseline coverage of 65% or less is US$14 and if ISS and non-ISS expenditures are included the cost per child is almost $20. Interpretation The success of ISS funding in countries with baseline DTP3 coverage of 65% or less provides evidence that a public-private partnership can work to reverse a negative trend in global health and that performance-related disbursement can work in some settings. Because ISS funding seems to have no effect in countries with baseline coverage greater than 65%, GAVI should consider redistributing its resources to countries with the lowest coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1095
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, New Products into Old Systems. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) from a country perspective
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION GAVI IMMU
[3]  
BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
[4]   Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon [J].
Beck, N ;
Katz, JN .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2001, 55 (02) :487-+
[5]  
Beck Nathaniel, 1996, POLIT ANAL, V6, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/PAN/6.1.1, 10.1093/pan/6.1.1]
[6]  
BHAWALKAR M, 2004, COMP METHODOLOGIES N
[7]   The costs of scaling up vaccination in the world's poorest countries [J].
Bishai, D ;
McQuestion, M ;
Chaudhry, R ;
Wigton, A .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (02) :348-356
[8]   IMMUNIZATION PROGRAMS AND THEIR COSTS [J].
BRENZEL, L ;
CLAQUIN, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 39 (04) :527-536
[9]   GAVI, the first steps: lessons for the Global Fund [J].
Brugha, R ;
Starling, M ;
Walt, G .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9304) :435-438
[10]   Aid, policies, and growth [J].
Burnside, C ;
Dollar, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (04) :847-868