Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending

被引:147
作者
Rohlmann, A. [1 ]
Zander, T. [1 ]
Rao, M. [1 ]
Bergmann, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Julius Wolff Inst, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Lumbar spine; Load application mode; Intradiscal pressure; Intersegmental rotation; Finite element analysis; TRUNK MUSCLE FORCES; SPINAL FIXATION DEVICES; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENTS; LUMBAR SPINE; INTRADISCAL PRESSURE; FINITE-ELEMENT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; INTERNAL FIXATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.017
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 [生物物理学];
摘要
Different modes of load applications are used to simulate flexion and extension of the upper body. It is not clear which loading modes deliver realistic results and allow the comparison of different studies. In a numerical study, a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine, ranging from the vertebra L1 to the disc L5-S1 was employed. Each of six different loading modes was studied for simulating flexion and extension, including pure moments, an eccentric axial force, using a wedged fixture, and applying upper body weight plus follower load plus muscle forces. Intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressures and facet joint contact forces were calculated. Where possible, results were compared to data measured in vivo. The results of the loading modes studied show a large variance for some values. Outcome measures such as flexion angle and intradiscal pressure differed at a segment by up to 44% and 88%, respectively, related to their maximum values. Intradiscal pressure is mainly determined by the magnitude of the applied compressive force. For flexion maximum contact forces between 0 and 69 N are predicted in each face joint for different loading modes. For both flexion and extension, applying upper body weight plus follower load plus muscle forces as well as a follower load together with a bending moment delivers results which agreed well with in vivo data from the literature. Choosing an adequate loading mode is important in spine biomechanics when realistic results are required for intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressure and facet joint contact forces. Only then will results of different studies be comparable. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 890
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
THE RESISTANCE TO FLEXION OF THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL JOINT [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
HUTTON, WC ;
STOTT, JRR .
SPINE, 1980, 5 (03) :245-253
[2]
ANDERSSON GBJ, 1977, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V129, P156
[3]
Estimation of trunk muscle forces using the finite element method and in vivo loads measured by telemeterized internal spinal fixation devices [J].
Calisse, J ;
Rohlmann, A ;
Bergmann, G .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (07) :727-731
[4]
Bioabsorbable anterior lumbar plate fixation in conjunction with cage-assisted anterior interbody fusion [J].
DiAngelo, DJ ;
Scifert, JL ;
Kitchel, S ;
Cornwall, GB ;
McVay, BJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (04) :447-455
[5]
Eberlein R., 2001, COMPUT METHOD BIOMEC, V4, P209, DOI [10.1080/10255840108908005, DOI 10.1080/10255840108908005]
[6]
Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants [J].
Goel, VK ;
Panjabi, MM ;
Patwardhan, AG ;
Dooris, AP ;
Serhan, H .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A :103-109
[7]
Effects of Charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol [J].
Goel, VK ;
Grauer, JN ;
Patel, TC ;
Biyani, A ;
Sairyo, K ;
Vishnubhotla, S ;
Matyas, A ;
Cowgill, I ;
Shaw, M ;
Long, R ;
Dick, D ;
Panjabi, MM ;
Serhan, H .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (24) :2755-2764
[8]
GOEL VK, 1993, SPINE, V18, P1531
[9]
Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle [J].
Heuer, Frank ;
Schmidt, Hendrik ;
Klezl, Zdenek ;
Claes, Lutz ;
Wilke, Hans-Joachim .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (02) :271-280
[10]
FLEXION-EXTENSION RHYTHM IN THE LUMBOSACRAL SPINE [J].
LIN, RM ;
YU, CY ;
CHANG, ZJ ;
LEE, CC ;
SU, FC .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (19) :2204-2209