Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS

被引:228
作者
Balcilar, Mehmet [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bonato, Matteo [4 ]
Demirer, Riza [5 ]
Gupta, Rangan [2 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Econ, Via Mersin 10, Famagusta, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Montpellier Business Sch, Montpellier, France
[4] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Econ & Econometr, Auckland Pk, South Africa
[5] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Econ & Finance, Edwardsville, IL 62026 USA
关键词
Geopolitical risks; Stock returns; Volatility; BRICS; CONSISTENT NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ECONOMIC-POLICY UNCERTAINTY; GRANGER CAUSALITY; CAPITAL-MARKETS; EXCHANGE-RATE; TERRORISM; PRICE; RETURNS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.05.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of geopolitical uncertainty on return and volatility dynamics in the BRICS stock markets via nonparametric causality-in-quantiles tests. The effect of geopolitical risks (GPRs) is found to be heterogeneous across the BRICS stock markets, suggesting that news regarding geopolitical tensions do not affect return dynamics in these markets in a uniform way. GPRs are generally found to impact stock market volatility measures rather than returns, and often at return quantiles below the median, indicating the role of GPRs as a driver of bad volatility in these markets. While Russia bears the greatest risk exposure to GPRs in terms of both return and volatility, India is found to be the most resilient BRICS nation in the group. Noting that geopolitical shocks and in particular terrorist incidents are largely unanticipated, our findings underscore the importance of a strong financial sector that can help return the market to stability and an open economy that allows local investors to diversify country-specific risks in their portfolios.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 306
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Terrorism and the world economy
    Abadie, Alberto
    Gardeazabal, Javier
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 52 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [2] Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts
    Andersen, TG
    Bollerslev, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) : 885 - 905
  • [3] [Anonymous], 201646 U PRET DEP EC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 201626 U PRET DEP EC
  • [5] [Anonymous], APPL EC LETT
  • [6] [Anonymous], FORBES MAGAZINE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, 59760 MPRA
  • [8] [Anonymous], BRICS FINANCIAL MARK
  • [9] [Anonymous], 201643 U PRET DEP EC
  • [10] The price of terror: The effects of terrorism on stock market returns and volatility
    Arin, K. Peren
    Ciferri, Davide
    Spagnolo, Nicola
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 101 (03) : 164 - 167