Reasons patients recommend laser in situ keratomileusis

被引:17
作者
Bailey, MD
Mitchell, GL
Dhaliwal, DK
Wachler, BSB
Olson, MD
Shovlin, JP
Pascucci, SE
Zadnik, K
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Eye & Ear, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Boxer Wachler Vis Inst, Beverly Hills, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] NE Eye Inst, Scranton, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reasons patients who have had laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) recommend it to others and examine the disparity between high levels of satisfaction and patient reports of night-vision symptoms and/or dry eye after LASIK. Setting: Northeastern Eye Institute, Scranton, and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: Questionnaires assessing symptoms and satisfaction after LASIK were mailed to 2100 patients. The questionnaires included items about night-vision symptoms and satisfaction and an open-ended question for patients to give their reasons for recommending LASIK to others. The open-ended responses were categorized and tabulated. Results: Four hundred thirty-four patients provided reasons for recommending LASIK to others. Sixteen categories of reasons were identified. "No more spectacles/contact lenses" was listed by 180 patients (42%), followed by "better vision" (21%) and "convenience" (15%). Women were significantly more likely to cite "better comfort" (27 women versus 3 men; chi square = 8.99, P = .003) and "better quality of life" (41 women versus 9 men; chi square = 7.36, P = .007) as a reason for recommending LASIK. Of the 35 patients who reported dissatisfaction with post-LASIK vision, 20 (57%) would recommend LASIK to a friend because "LASIK helps others." Conclusions: Categories of reasons for recommending LASIK to others were similar to reasons given by patients for seeking LASIK. Some patients who reported dissatisfaction with their vision said they would recommend LASIK, suggesting that recommendation of LASIK to others is not necessarily a measurement of the quality of a patient's vision after LASIK. (C) 2004 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1861 / 1866
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[2]   Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Bailey, MD ;
Mitchell, GL ;
Dhaliwal, DK ;
Wachler, BSB ;
Zadnik, K .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (07) :1371-1378
[3]   Laser in situ keratomileusis with a scanning excimer laser for the correction of low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism [J].
Balazsi, G ;
Mullie, M ;
Lasswell, L ;
Lee, PA ;
Duh, YJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (12) :1942-1951
[4]   Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy - Part 2: Survey of 690 patients [J].
Brunette, I ;
Gresset, J ;
Boivin, JF ;
Pop, M ;
Thompson, P ;
Lafond, GP ;
Makni, H .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (09) :1790-1796
[5]   AN EVALUATION OF INTERNAL-MAMMARY-ARTERY LIGATION BY A DOUBLE-BLIND TECHNIC [J].
COBB, LA ;
THOMAS, GI ;
DILLARD, DH ;
MERENDINO, KA ;
BRUCE, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1959, 260 (22) :1115-1118
[6]  
El Danasoury MA, 1998, J REFRACT SURG, V14, P512
[7]  
Hill JC, 2002, J REFRACT SURG, V18, P454
[8]   Cognitive dissonance, the placebo effect and the evaluation of surgical results [J].
Homer, JJ ;
Sheard, CE ;
Jones, NS .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 25 (03) :195-199
[9]   Symptoms of dry eye and recurrent erosion syndrome after refractive surgery [J].
Hovanesian, JA ;
Shah, SS ;
Maloney, RK .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (04) :577-584
[10]   Defining the content of patient questionnaires: Reasons for seeking laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia [J].
Khan-Lim, D ;
Craig, JP ;
McGhee, CNJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (05) :788-794