Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account

被引:201
作者
Diana, RA [1 ]
Reder, LM
Arndt, J
Park, H
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03193807
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The majority of computationally specified models of recognition memory have been based on a single-process interpretation, claiming that familiarity is the only influence on recognition. There is increasing evidence that recognition is, in fact, based on two processes: recollection and familiarity. This article reviews the current state of the evidence for dual-process models, including the usefulness of the remember/know paradigm, and interprets the relevant results in terms of the source of activation confusion (SAC) model of memory. We argue that the evidence from each of the areas we discuss, when combined, presents a strong case that inclusion of a recollection process is necessary. Given this conclusion, we also argue that the dual-process claim that the recollection process is always available is, in fact, more parsimonious than the single-process claim that the recollection process is used only in certain paradigms. The value of a well-specified process model such as the SAC model is discussed with regard to other types of dual-process models.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1998, ATOMIC COMPONENTS TH
[2]   An integrated theory of list memory [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Bothell, D ;
Lebiere, C ;
Matessa, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (04) :341-380
[3]   RETRIEVAL OF PROPOSITIONAL INFORMATION FROM LONG-TERM MEMORY [J].
ANDERSON, JR .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 6 (04) :451-474
[4]   Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation [J].
Arndt, J ;
Reder, LA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (05) :830-842
[5]   Lexical, sublexical, and implicit memory processes in healthy young and healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type [J].
Balota, DA ;
Ferraro, FR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 10 (01) :82-95
[6]   The word-frequency mirror effect in young, old, and early-stage Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for two processes in episodic recognition performance [J].
Balota, DA ;
Burgess, GC ;
Cortese, MJ ;
Adams, DR .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 46 (01) :199-226
[7]   One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory [J].
Boldini, A ;
Russo, R ;
Avons, SE .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (02) :353-361
[8]   A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments [J].
Brockdorff, N ;
Lamberts, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (01) :77-102
[9]   A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition [J].
Cary, M ;
Reder, LM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 49 (02) :231-248
[10]   CUEING EFFECTS AND ASSOCIATIVE INFORMATION IN RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
CLARK, SE ;
SHIFFRIN, RM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1992, 20 (05) :580-598