Risk analysis of industrial structures under extreme transient loads

被引:39
作者
Talaslidis, DG [1 ]
Manolis, GD
Paraskevopoulos, E
Panagiotopoulos, C
Pelekasis, N
Tsamopoulos, JA
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Civil Engn, Lab Appl Stat, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Thessaly, Dept Mech Engn, Lab Fluid Mech, GR-38334 Volos, Greece
[3] Univ Patras, Dept Chem Engn, Lab Computat Fluid Dynam, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
关键词
chemical explosions; industrial structures; finite elements; fragility curves; Latin hypercube method; risk analysis; seismic loads; structural dynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.02.003
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A modular analysis package is assembled for assessing risk in typical industrial structural units such as steel storage tanks, due to extreme transient loads that are produced either as a result of chemical explosions in the form of atmospheric blasts or because of seismic activity in the form of ground motions. The main components of the methodology developed for this purpose are as follows: (i) description of blast overpressure and ground seismicity, (ii) transient non-linear finite element analysis of the industrial structure, (iii) development of 3D-equivalent. continuous beam multi-degree-of-freedom structural models, (iv) introduction of soil-structure interaction effects, (v) probabilistic description of the loading process and the stiffness/mass characteristics of the structure, and (vi) generation of fragility curves for estimation of structural damage levels by using the Latin hypercube statistical sampling method. These fragility curves can then be used within the context of the engineering analysis-design cycle, so as to minimize structural failure probability under both man-made hazards such as blasts and natural hazards such as earthquake-induced transient loads. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 448
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Baker WE., 1983, Explosion hazards and evaluation
  • [2] Bangash MYH., 1993, Impact and Explosion: Analysis and Design
  • [3] BASHARA FBA, 1994, COMPUT STRUCT, V51, P585
  • [4] A TIME INTEGRATION ALGORITHM FOR STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS WITH IMPROVED NUMERICAL DISSIPATION - THE GENERALIZED-ALPHA METHOD
    CHUNG, J
    HULBERT, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1993, 60 (02): : 371 - 375
  • [5] Methods for seismic risk analysis: State of the art versus advanced state of the practice
    Franchin, P
    Lupoi, A
    Pinto, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2002, 6 : 131 - 155
  • [6] Stochastic finite-element analysis of seismic soil-structure interaction
    Ghiocel, DM
    Ghanem, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2002, 128 (01): : 66 - 77
  • [7] Henrych J, 1979, DYNAMICS EXPLOSION
  • [8] PROBABILISTIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
    HWANG, HHM
    JAW, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1990, 116 (07): : 1992 - 2007
  • [9] Kinney GF, 1985, EXPLOSIVE SHOCKS AIR
  • [10] Risk assessment of an interacting structure-soil system due to liquefaction
    Koutsourelakis, S
    Prévost, JH
    Deodatis, G
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (04) : 851 - 879