PROCESS PREFERENCES AND VOTING IN DIRECT DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS

被引:12
作者
Dyck, Joshua J. [1 ]
Baldassare, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Polit Sci, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Publ Policy Inst Calif, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
关键词
CALIFORNIA; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfp027
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Direct democracy is extraordinarily popular and has become a pervasive policymaking tool at the state and local level. Repeated surveys have demonstrated that Americans strongly approve of allowing people to vote on citizen-proposed laws, a method currently allowed in about half of all states and in many municipalities across the country. This paper examines both the extent of this support and its implications. Using a battery of questions about the institution as an independent variable, we model the extent to which institutional evaluations of direct democracy influence voting behavior in ballot measure elections. Using data from California in 2005 and 2006, as well as Washington in 2006, we find support for the notion that process evaluations influence choice in ballot initiative elections, regardless of policy content. Those who favor direct democracy are more likely to vote yes, while those who are apprehensive about voting on ballot measures are more likely to vote no.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 565
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REGRESSION MODELS CA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CITIZENS LEGISLATORS
[3]  
Apter DavidE., 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[4]  
BALDASSARE M, 2007, COMING AGE DIRECT DE
[5]  
Baldassare Mark., 2002, A California State of Mind: The Conflicted Voter in a Changing World
[6]  
Bowler Shaun., 1998, Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy
[7]  
Branton RP, 2003, POLIT RES QUART, V56, P367
[8]  
Campbell A, 1960, AM VOTER
[9]  
Craig Stephen., 2001, Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum campaigns
[10]   Public opinion and direct democracy [J].
Dalton, RJ ;
Bürklin, W ;
Drummond, A .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2001, 12 (04) :141-153