When to defer to majority testimony - and when not

被引：33

作者：

Pettit, Philip ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00612.x

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：179 / 187

页数：9

共 15 条

[1]

[Anonymous], PHILOS ISSUES S1

[2]

[Anonymous], 2001, NOUS, DOI DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.35.S15.4

[3]

CHRISTENSEN D, 2004, EPISTEMOLOGY DISAGRE

[4]

DIETRICH F, SOCIAL CHOICE WELFAR

[5]

ELGA A, 2006, PHILOSOPHY

[6] OPINION LEADERS, INDEPENDENCE, AND CONDORCET JURY THEOREM [J].

ESTLUND, DM .

[7]

Kelly T., 2005, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST

[8] THE ONE AND THE MANY - ADJUDICATION IN COLLEGIAL COURTS [J].

KORNHAUSER, LA ;

SAGER, LG .

[9] The discursive dilemma and public reason [J].

List, C .

List, C .