Towards an early-stage identification of emerging topics in science-The usability of bibliometric characteristics

被引:14
作者
Mund, Carolin [1 ]
Neuhaeusler, Peter [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SAP Deutschland SE & Co KG, D-69190 Walldorf, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Berlin Univ Technol, Chair Innovat Econ, VWS 2, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Bibliometrics; Emerging topics; Identification; Early-stage; CITATION; PUBLICATION; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; IMPACT; TRUST; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The assessment of research topics according to their development stage can be used for different purposes, most importantly for decisions regarding the (financial) support of research groups and regions. In this work, we try to determine the influencing factors of emerging scientific topics during their early development stage. Documents in five pre-defined fields are analyzed with regard to the characteristics of the involved authors, their references and journals. With the help of an assignment to emerging and established topics, the publication behavior of documents in different development stages can be compared. Foremost, indicators can be derived that can help to identify publications in emerging topics in science at an early-stage after publication. The results show that the field differences are so pronounced that they hamper generalization. The field specific analysis, however, suggests that at least for some fields a pre-selection of emerging topics can be made. In technical fields, the involvement of larger groups of researchers is an apparent feature, while in medicine a contrary observation could be made. In addition, for the field of engineering we found that emerging topics are more often published in older but smaller journals, which indicates a high specialization of the publications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1018 / 1033
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Our starting point
    Alexander, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2012, 1 : 1 - 4
  • [2] Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences
    Alvargonzalez, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 25 (04) : 387 - 403
  • [3] Strategies for Collaboration in the Interdisciplinary Field of Emerging Zoonotic Diseases
    Anholt, R. M.
    Stephen, C.
    Copes, R.
    [J]. ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 59 (04) : 229 - 240
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, REGRESSION MODELS CA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, REGRESSION MODELS CA, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.007
  • [6] Atkins Peter., 2003, Galileo's Finger: The Ten Great Ideas of Science
  • [8] The ups and downs of peer review
    Benos, Dale J.
    Bashari, Edlira
    Chaves, Jose M.
    Gaggar, Amit
    Kapoor, Niren
    LaFrance, Martin
    Mans, Robert
    Mayhew, David
    McGowan, Sara
    Polter, Abigail
    Qadri, Yawar
    Sarfare, Shanta
    Schultz, Kevin
    Splittgerber, Ryan
    Stephenson, Jason
    Tower, Cristy
    Walton, R. Grace
    Zotov, Alexander
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [9] FATE OF MANUSCRIPTS REJECTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE AJR
    CHEW, FS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (03) : 627 - 632
  • [10] The "Mendel syndrome" in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists
    Costas, Rodrigo
    van Leeuwen, Thed N.
    van Raan, Anthony F. J.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (01) : 177 - 205